Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Complications associated with removal of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of removal in deeply anaesthetised versus awake patients.
The purpose of the study was to compare the incidence of complications (coughing, biting, retching, vomiting, excessive salivation and airway obstruction) associated with removal of the laryngeal mask airway. The laryngeal mask airway was used in 100 adults undergoing urological procedures. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. ⋯ No decrease in arterial oxygenation occurred in the anaesthetised patients in whom the laryngeal mask was removed by the anaesthetist. In 14 patients in the awake group the pH of secretions at the tip of the laryngeal mask was < or = 3 compared with only four patients in the anaesthetised group (P < 0.05). It is concluded that it may be safer to remove the laryngeal mask airway whilst the patients are deeply anaesthetised in the operating room than when they are awake in the recovery room.
-
We describe the use of a laryngeal mask airway in three adult patients whose mouth opening varied from 12 mm to 18 mm. The first patient's incisal opening was 12 mm. His airway was otherwise normal and the standard laryngeal mask was used as the definitive airway for the 90 min revision of facial scars and bone graft to mandible. ⋯ The third patient, in addition to a mouth opening of only 18 mm, had limited neck movement from previous flap reconstruction following mandibulectomy, hemiglossectomy and radical neck dissection. For three more reconstructive head and neck procedures that ranged from 90 min to nine hours, the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask was inserted under topical anaesthesia and its correct position confirmed by fibreoptic laryngoscopy before induction of general anaesthesia. Maintenance of anaesthesia in all cases was uneventful and there were no postoperative complications.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Thiopentone pretreatment for propofol injection pain in ambulatory patients.
This study investigated propofol injection pain in patients undergoing ambulatory anaesthesia. In a randomized, double-blind trial, 90 women were allocated to receive one of three treatments prior to induction of anaesthesia with propofol. Patients in Group C received 2 ml normal saline, Group L, 2 ml, lidocaine 2% (40 mg) and Group T, 2 ml thiopentone 2.5% (50 mg). ⋯ Recovery room discharge times were similar: C (75.9 +/- 19.4 min); L 73.6 +/- 21.6 min); T (77.1 +/- 18.9 min). Assessing their overall satisfaction, 89.7% would choose propofol anaesthesia again. We conclude that lidocaine reduces the incidence and severity of propofol injection pain in ambulatory patients whereas thiopentone only reduces its severity.
-
The purpose of this study was to compare the pattern of recovery from vecuronium 0.07 mg.kg-1 induced neuromuscular blockade using post-tetanic burst count (PTBC)-(three short tetanic bursts of 0.2 msec duration every 20 msec given every second following a tetanus), and post-tetanic count (PTC)-(0.2 msec single twitch stimuli given every second following a tetanus) using an accelerometer in 60 adult patients during nitrous oxide-oxygen-isoflurane anaesthesia. In addition, the relationship among PTBC, PTC, and T1 (the 1st response in the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation) was examined to investigate whether the PTBC had an advantage over the PTC or TOF for evaluating intense neuromuscular blockade. The PTBC was greater than PTC during the 15-35 min after the administration of vecuronium (unpaired t test with Bonferroni's correction, P < 0.05). ⋯ Time from the return of PTB to that of T1 was longer than the time from the return of PTC to that of T1 (13.3 +/- 2.6 vs 9.2 +/- 2.8 min, unpaired t test, P = 0.0003). At the return of T1, PTBC was greater than PTC (14.3 +/- 6.9 vs 9.4 +/- 2.3, unpaired t test, P = 0.0153). These results suggest that, using PTBC, a more profound level of neuromuscular blockade can be evaluated than that using PTC.
-
The authors report the successful treatment of post-dural puncture headache, consequent to a cervical dural puncture, with a lumbar extradural blood patch. The increase in intracranial pressure generated by the injection of autologous blood in the extradural space seems to be the likely mechanism for the prompt relief of post-dural puncture headache. We conclude that extradural injection of autologous blood at the same level of the dural puncture may not be necessary.