Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Practice Guideline
Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia - Revised Edition 2022.
The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2022 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. ⋯ Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia-related complications in obstetric patients could be catastrophic and impact the lives of both the parturient and the neonate. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency, temporal trend, and risk factors of anesthesia-related adverse events during hospitalization for delivery in Canada. ⋯ The incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events in obstetric patients in Canada is low and declining. High vigilance is required in parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery, receiving general anesthesia, and those with pre-existing medical conditions.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Comparison of analgesic modalities for patients undergoing midline laparotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Midline laparotomy is associated with severe pain. Epidural analgesia has been the established standard, but multiple alternative regional anesthesia modalities are now available. We aimed to compare continuous and single-shot regional anesthesia techniques in this systematic review and network meta-analysis. ⋯ Single-shot AWB were only clinically effective for analgesia in the early postoperative period. Continuous regional anesthesia modalities increased the duration of analgesia relative to their single-shot counterparts. Epidural analgesia remained clinically superior to alternative continuous regional anesthesia techniques for the first 24 hr, but reached equivalence, at least with respect to static pain, with continuous AWB and WI by 48 hr.