Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A multicentre randomized study of single-unit dose package of EMLA patch vs EMLA 5% cream for venepuncture in children.
Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) cream with Tegaderm was compared with pre-packaged EMLA patch with regard to analgesic effect, adhesiveness and local reactions during venepuncture in 178 children from three to ten years. One EMLA patch, or half the contents of a 5 g tube of EMLA cream plus Tegaderm was applied to the dorsum of one hand or antecubital fossa for a minimum of 60 min before venepuncture. The subject and observer assessed the degree of pain on a three-point verbal rating scale. ⋯ There was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of overall local reactions. The patch was less adhesive (P < 0.001), but this had no apparent influence on its effectiveness. In conclusion, EMLA patch is equivalent to 5% EMLA cream (2.5 g) in cutaneous pain relief when used for venepuncture in children.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Propofol anaesthesia in paediatric ambulatory patients: a comparison with thiopentone and halothane.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the haemodynamic changes during induction, as well as the speed and quality of recovery when propofol (vs thiopentone and/or halothane) was used for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in paediatric outpatients. One hundred unmedicated children, 3-12-yr-old, scheduled for ambulatory surgery were studied. The most common surgical procedures performed were eye muscle surgery (42%), plastic surgery (21%), dental restoration (15%), and urological procedures (15%). ⋯ The mean propofol dose required to prevent movement was 267 +/- 83 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. The overall pattern of haemodynamic changes, as well as awakening (extubation) times were not different among the four groups. Children who received propofol recovered faster (22 vs 29-36 min) (P < 0.05), were discharged home sooner (101 vs 127-144 min) (P < 0.05), and had less postoperative vomiting (4 vs 24-48%) (P < 0.05) than all others.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) has not been demonstrated in human single lung anaesthesia in the lateral decubitus position (LDP). The purpose of this study was to determine whether (1) HPV occurs in the non-dependent, non-ventilated lung, and (2) if the infusion of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) inhibits HPV. During intravenous anaesthesia the tracheas of seven patients were intubated with double lumen endotracheal tubes. ⋯ With SNP infusion there was a 30% increase in cardiac index (CI) (P < 0.05). The SNP infusion was not associated with changes in Qs/Qt or PaO2. This model demonstrates changes in Qs/Qt and PaO2 associated with single-lung ventilation in ASA I and II patients in the LDP but we were unable to demonstrate inhibition of HPV by SNP.
-
In many institutions postoperative patients may receive morphine for analgesia administered into the epidural space, epidural opioid analgesia (EOA), or through intravenous self-administered patient-controlled analgesia pumps (PCA). Although a number of studies have compared the two approaches with regard to efficacy and side effects, there is less known with regard to patient satisfaction and its sources. In this study, 711 patients using PCA morphine and 205 patients receiving epidural morphine following a variety of gynaecological, urological, orthopaedic, and general surgical procedures rated their satisfaction with the method they used on a 0-10 verbal analogue satisfaction scale (0 = very dissatisfied; 10 = very satisfied). ⋯ Overall satisfaction (mean +/- SD) in the two large groups was 8.6 +/- 1.8 for PCA and 9.0 +/- 1.5 for EOA (P < 0.01). In the subset of 100 patients, there were differences between the EOA and PCA groups with regard to the advantages and disadvantages selected. Patients in the PCA group identified "personal control" and "method worked quickly" as advantages whereas patients receiving EOA selected "clear mind," "effective relief resting," and "effective relief while moving or coughing." The single disadvantage identified more frequently by PCA patients was "pain immediately after surgery before method became effective." Disadvantages identified more frequently by EOA patients were "side effects" and "poor pain relief." We conclude that overall patient satisfaction was high whether patients received PCA or EOA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)