Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Combined saphenous and sciatic catheters for analgesia after major ankle surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Continuous sciatic nerve block is used for pain management following major ankle surgery. Pain from the saphenous nerve territory often persists. We conducted a double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a supplementary saphenous catheter in the proximal thigh combined with a popliteal sciatic catheter and single-shot saphenous nerve block after major ankle surgery. ⋯ A saphenous catheter with a low-dose continuous infusion of ropivacaine, as an adjunct to a sciatic catheter, had no effect on the postoperative analgesia after major ankle surgery when both catheters were inserted along the short axis of the nerves. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01445210).
-
Ambulatory surgery is generally considered safe; however, as many as 3% of patients require unplanned acute postoperative care. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of the day of the week of surgery on the outcomes of ambulatory surgery. ⋯ On a population level, there was a small effect of the day of the week of ambulatory surgery on outcomes; however, the clinical impact is likely not relevant. Certain surgical types may be more susceptible to a day of the week effect, but more research is needed to elucidate this notion.
-
Editorial Comment
The "Friday effect": Can epidemiology tell us when to operate?
-
Retraction Of Publication
Retraction Note to: Nicorandil accelerates recovery of neuromuscular block caused by vecuronium.
Retraction Note to: Can J Anesth 2001; 1: 28–33, DOI 10.1007/BF03019810. To our readers: Further to the Expression of Concern (http://www.springer.com/medicine/anesthesiology/journal/12630) posted online, it is with considerable regret that the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia hereby retracts the above-cited article by Dr. ⋯ Fujii in this study are exceedingly unlikely; and 2) the inability of Dr. Fujii’s institution to attest to the integrity of the study and/ or the data conducted under its auspices, as set out in the Joint Editors-in-Chief Request for Determination of April 9, 2012.