Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block - within versus distal to the adductor canal: a proof-of-principle randomized trial.
Reliable saphenous nerve blockade is a desirable complement to popliteal sciatic nerve blockade for foot and ankle surgery. We compared two promising ultrasound-guided techniques, the supine adductor canal (AC) technique and the prone peri-saphenous branch of the descending genicular artery (Peri-SBDGA) technique, using 8 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:400,000. ⋯ In this randomized trial, we found no differences in nerve visibility, block success rate, or onset between the AC and Peri-SBDGA techniques of ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve blockade, although the former technique provided superior vascular landmark visibility. Neither technique produced a sufficiently high success rate to provide reliable surgical anesthesia per se.
-
Timely communication of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings to the postoperative care team is critical to optimizing patient care. We compared the use of a personal computer (PC) system with the use of a mobile tablet device (MTD) system for point-of-care TEE data entry and hypothesized that the MTD-based system would reduce the time to preliminary TEE reporting and decrease the incidence of delinquent reporting by 50%. ⋯ Implementation of a MTD system for data entry leads to improved TEE reporting time and reduces TEE reporting delinquency. Further studies are required to determine whether this strategy enhances quality of reporting, optimizes communication between care teams, and improves outcomes without increasing costs.
-
Practice Guideline
Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia - Revised Edition 2015.
The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2015 (the guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. Because the guidelines are subject to revision, updated versions are published annually. ⋯ Each anesthesiologist should exercise his or her own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.