Epilepsy research
-
Review Comparative Study
Animal models of epilepsy for the development of antiepileptogenic and disease-modifying drugs. A comparison of the pharmacology of kindling and post-status epilepticus models of temporal lobe epilepsy.
Control of epilepsy has primarily focused on suppressing seizure activity by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) after epilepsy has developed. AEDs have greatly improved the lives of people with epilepsy. However, the belief that AEDs, in addition to suppressing seizures, alter the underlying epileptogenic process and, in doing so, the course of the disease and its prognosis, is not supported by the current clinical and experimental data. ⋯ However, when these models are used for studying the antiepileptogenic effects of drugs, marked differences between models exist, indicating that the processes underlying epileptogenesis differ among models, even among different post-status models of TLE. A problem for clinical validation of TLE models is the lack of an AED, which effectively prevents epilepsy in humans. Thus, at present, it is not possible to judge which chronic model is best suited for developing new strategies in the search for antiepileptogenic and disease-modifying drugs, but rather a battery of models should be used to avoid false negative or positive predictions.
-
Despite the release of eight antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during the last decade, the incidence of pharmacoresistant epilepsy has changed relatively little. Predicting efficacy and safety of AEDs in people with epilepsy from acute seizure models in rodents is difficult and risky. ⋯ In this review the use of pharmacogenomic and pharmacokinetic techniques in the development and monitoring of antiepileptic drug therapy is reviewed. Genetic techniques have the potential of identifying novel drug targets, predicting drug response, and identifying individuals at risk for serious idosyncratic reactions.
-
Results of experiments performed in animal epilepsy models and human epilepsy during the past decade indicate that the epileptic brain is not a stable neuronal network, but undergoes modifications caused by the underlying etiology and/or recurrent seizures. In many forms of epilepsy, such as temporal lobe epilepsy, the underlying etiologic factor triggers a cascade of events (epileptogenesis) leading to spontaneous seizures and cognitive decline. In some patients, the condition progresses, due in part to recurrent seizures. ⋯ Here we review the available data regarding the neuroprotective effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at different phases of the epileptic process. Analysis of published data suggests that initial-insult modification and prevention of the progression of seizure-induced damage are candidate indications for treatment with AEDs. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the progression of epileptic process will eventually show what role AEDs have in the neuroprotective and antiepileptogenic treatment regimen.
-
Meta Analysis
Levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, remacemide and zonisamide for drug resistant localization-related epilepsy: a systematic review.
To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo controlled add-on trials of levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, remacemide and zonisamide for patients with drug resistant localization related epilepsy. ⋯ These data suggest a useful effect for levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and zonisamide. Levetiracetam has the more favourable 'responder-withdrawal ratio' followed by zonisamide and oxcarbazepine.
-
Traditional randomized clinical trials for the monotherapy assessment of antiepileptic drugs (AED) involve allocation of newly diagnosed patients to long-term treatment with different AEDs in order to determine remission rates and side effect profile. Apart from being time-consuming, however, these trials are unlikely to show significant differences in seizure control between the various drugs, which may lead some regulatory agencies to argue that remission rates could be related to the natural history of the disease rather than to efficacy of the administered drugs. To circumvent this problem, a number of innovative designs for the monotherapy assessment of new AEDs have been developed in recent years. ⋯ A review of the literature, however, reveals that long-term trials with new AEDs completed to date had significant shortcomings in their design, including excessively rigid or inappropriate dosing schedules, enrollment of patients with heterogeneous seizure disorders, low statistical power and insufficient duration of follow-up. Because these studies are usually aimed at addressing regulatory requirements, the information obtained cannot be meaningfully applied to routine clinical practice. Large longer-term randomized comparative trials using more pragmatic approaches are highly needed to determine the real value of first-line therapy with new AEDs in patients with well defined seizure disorders.