Annals of vascular surgery
-
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for restenosis (RS) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is presumed to have fewer complications than CAS for primary atherosclerotic (PA) lesions. It has been proposed that interventionalists may limit themselves to CAS for RS initially, while they gain additional experience during their learning curve. However, there are few studies objectively comparing the outcomes of the two groups of patients to substantiate this assumption. ⋯ CAS for RS must therefore not be considered a low-risk procedure. Technical proficiency for CAS must be equivalent regardless of the etiology of the stenosis. These observations also underscore the need for appropriate patient selection and close follow-up of all patients undergoing CAS.
-
Comparative Study
Regional anesthesia for carotid surgery: less intraoperative hypotension and vasopressor requirement.
Regional anesthesia (RA) is the gold standard of neuromonitoring during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Recent data show that RA for CEA is associated with fewer postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to assess hemodynamic stability and vasoactive drug use for CEA performed under RA versus general anesthesia (GA). ⋯ There was no significant difference between groups in hypotension or hypertension episodes seen in the postoperative recovery room. RA was associated with less hypotension and less vasopressor used during CEA compared to GA. The improved hemodynamic stability may account for the lower incidence of complications after CEA.
-
The short-term effectiveness and safety placement of superior vena cava (SVC) filter in the treatment of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with contraindication to anticoagulation have been well documented. However, as opposed to the numerous reported experiences with inferior vena cava filter placement and its complications, there has been no documented long-term follow-up on SVC filter placement. We, therefore, reviewed our experience with SVC filter placement. ⋯ SVC filter placement is associated with a low incidence of complications with long-term follow-up. These data help to reaffirm the safety and effectiveness of SVC filter placement. However, SVC perforation in young males remains a significant issue.
-
Review Meta Analysis
What is the evidence on efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in (subgroups of) patients with critical limb ischemia?
The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been advocated for the management of ischemic pain and the prevention of amputations in patients with inoperable critical limb ischemia (CLI), although data on benefit are conflicting. Several reports described apparently differential treatment effects in subgroups. The purpose of this study was to analyze the data on the efficacy of SCS and to clarify preselection issues. ⋯ The analysis did not indicate a subgroup of patients who might specifically be helped by SCS. Meta-analysis including all randomized data shows insufficient evidence for higher efficacy of SCS treatment compared with best medical treatment alone. Although some factors provide prognostic information as to the risk of amputation in patients with CLI, there are no data supporting a more favorable treatment effect in any group.
-
The aim of this study was to determine whether vascular patients are becoming progressively more obese and whether morbid obesity affects outcomes from vascular surgery. Data for the index vascular procedures of infrainguinal bypass, carotid endarterectomy, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair were collected in a computer database for 1996-2006. Body mass index (BMI) was stratified into <18.5 kg/m2 as underweight, >35 kg/m2 as morbidly obese, and other as control (18.5 < BMI < 35). ⋯ Procedures performed on morbidly obese subjects take longer, and these patients have higher rates of infectious complications. This is mainly attributable to AAA. This did not translate into poorer final outcomes in this study, although significant differences might emerge from a larger sample.