Annals of vascular surgery
-
Meta Analysis
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) occur in over 10% of diabetic patients and are associated with high morbidity. Clinical trials have shown benefit from extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in a DFU healing. This systematic review aims to assess the currently available evidence examining the efficacy of ESWT on healing of DFU. ⋯ This systematic review concludes that ESWT has the potential to improve healing in DFUs, although there is, as yet, insufficient evidence to justify its use in routine clinical practice. The meta-analysis has a high risk of bias and is unlikely to reflect true effect size because of problematic risk of bias in included studies. This review highlights the variable quality of methodology of trials and dosing of shockwave therapy and the need for robust adequately powered research into this promising therapy.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Aortic Curvature Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Assessing Device Conformability, Using Image Vector Analysis.
Aortic arch curvature can be straightened by endograft placement. However, different measurement methods with dissimilar follow-up and endografts have been published. The aim of this study was to corroborate, for the first time, the pliability of the Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) into the aortic arch, using different image vector analysis. ⋯ Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis thoracic endograft showed a good pliability into the aortic arch and proximal thoracic aorta, with minimal changes in the aortic curvature after endograft placement in the short-term follow-up (up to six months). In addition, final endograft length into outer aortic curvature is highly predictable.
-
Comparative Study
Q-TWiST and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endovascular versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a High Deliberate Practice Volume Center.
The objective of the study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of endovascular aortic repair (rEVAR) versus open surgical repair (rOSR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), where rEVAR is regularly performed outside of instructions for use (IFUs) (shorter and more angulated necks). Primary end point is incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of rEVAR versus rOSR and aneurysm-related mortality. Secondary end points are cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), perioperative morbidity and mortality, reintervention, and all-cause mortality. ⋯ There is no significant difference in cost or QALYs between rEVAR and rOSR even when rEVAR is performed on complex cases outside of IFU (shorter and more angulated necks). There is a significantly higher freedom from secondary intervention in rOSR patients compared with rEVAR patients at 3 years.
-
TEVAR is the preferred way of treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of TEVAR on aortic remodeling in the thoracic and abdominal segment in long-term follow-up. ⋯ TEVAR for complicated acute aortic type B dissection is a safe and effective method of protecting thoracic aorta. The procedure was effective in majority of patients, and in 80% of the cases, there was no need for additional distal aortic coverage. The abdominal aorta is relatively stable over a long period of observation in complicated type B aortic dissection.
-
Our primary objective was to test if the Clavien-Dindo classification (C-D-C) is also applicable for the assessment of carotid surgery and how well it correlates with patient prognosis in the mid-term follow-up. ⋯ The C-D-C is applicable for patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy, and the classification seems to make a good correlation of the grade of the complication and the prognosis during follow-up. More studies are needed with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up times to clarify the use of the C-D-C after vascular surgery and identify high-risk patients. It can also be helpful to homogenize reports and make them comparable.