European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
-
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Jun 2009
Does pretransplant left ventricular assist device therapy improve results after heart transplantation in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance?
Pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >2.5 Wood units (WU) and (or) a transpulmonary gradient (TPG) >12 mmHg, is an established risk factor for mortality in heart transplantation. Elevated PVR in heart transplant candidates can be reduced using a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and LVAD is proposed to be the treatment of choice for candidates with PH. We analyzed the effect on PVR of pretransplant LVAD therapy in patients with PH and compared posttransplant outcome with matched controls. Long-term survival was compared between heart transplant recipients with mild, moderate or severe PH and patients with no PH. ⋯ Pretransplant LVAD therapy reduces an elevated PVR in heart transplant recipients, but there was no statistically significant difference in posttransplant survival in patients with PH with, or without LVAD therapy. The study revealed no differences in survival in patients regardless of the severity of the PH.
-
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Jun 2009
Case ReportsPulmonary trunk perforation during transapical minimal invasive aortic valve replacement.
In this case report we illustrate our experience with a perforation of the pulmonary trunk during a transapical aortic valve implantation in a single case. The patient suffered from an aortic valve stenosis and was accepted for a minimally invasive procedure because of multiple comorbidities. ⋯ Median sternotomy showed a bleeding out of the pulmonary trunk that could be stopped with purse-string sutures. The further course of the patient was uneventful.
-
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Jun 2009
Aortic size in acute type A dissection: implications for preventive ascending aortic replacement.
Elective ascending aortic replacement is recommended to prevent acute type A aortic dissection when any segment of the proximal aorta is greater than 5.5 cm. However, little data exist that meticulously describe the size of the ascending aorta at multiple levels in patients who suffer acute type A dissections. We sought to definitively characterize the size distribution of the proximal aorta in this patient population. ⋯ The majority of patients with acute type A aortic dissection present with aortic diameters <5.5 cm and thus do not fall within current guidelines for elective ascending aortic replacement. Methods other than size measurement of the ascending aorta are needed to identify patients at risk for dissection. Aggressive medical management of patients with ascending aortic diameters over 4 cm is warranted. Preventative replacement of the ascending aorta at 4.5 cm should be considered especially at high volume aortic surgery centers and patients having cardiac surgery for other indications.
-
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Jun 2009
Short-term systolic and diastolic ventricular performance after surgical ventricular restoration for dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Based on the adverse relationship between left ventricular (LV) remodeling and clinical outcome in ischemic cardiomyopathy, surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) is proposed as a valuable adjunct procedure. This study reports on the short-term clinical and hemodynamical performance of SVR. ⋯ SVR in addition to coronary revascularization and restrictive mitral annuloplasty results in significant clinical improvement in selected patients with advanced ischemic heart disease and severely dilated ventricles. SVR entails immediate improvement of systolic function, which remains sustained during short-term follow-up. Serial assessment of diastolic function is mandatory as LV compliance seems more sensitive to early changes induced by recurrence of mitral regurgitation and secondary ventricular dilation. Moreover, worsening of diastolic dysfunction should be timely recognized because of its adverse clinical impact.