Seminars in vascular surgery
-
Review Comparative Study
The fate of patients with critical leg ischemia.
In some highly specialized and aggressive units, 90% of patients with critical leg ischemia (CLI) will undergo some form of surgical or endovascular procedure; however, in most, the figure is nearer 50 to 60%. The primary amputation rate varies from around 10% to 40%. The mortality rate in these patients with standard therapy is around 20% at 1 year and between 40% and 70% at 5 years. ⋯ There appears to be a decline in overall major amputation rates associated with a corresponding increase in revascularizations. However, although technical advances may have resulted in a steadying or even decrease in amputations, comparisons of total amputations over a longer period suggest an increase, presumably attributable to an aging population. Some forward projections predict that major amputations will be doubled in the next 30 years.
-
The major amputation rate is approximately 200 to 500/million/yr and occurs in patients presenting with an acute onset of critical leg ischemia (CLI) rather than in patients who steadily progress through increasingly severe claudication to rest pain and ulcers. Diabetics, who form only 2% to 5% of the population, form 40% to 45% of all amputees. Although it is widely believed that a below-knee (BK) to above-knee (AK) amputation ratio of 2.5 is the minimum acceptable for units providing a lower limb amputation service, the ratio is in fact usually very much below the recommended figure. ⋯ A total of 90% of AK major amputations heal, 70% primarily. Two to three times as many BK amputees achieve full mobility than AK amputees, and there has not been any dramatic change in 20 years. The fate of the amputee 2 years after a successful BK amputation will be that 15% will have been converted to an AK amputation, another 15% will have had a contralateral major amputation, and 30% will be dead.
-
Arterial and venous trauma of the cervicothoracic region continues to present challenging problems for the surgeon, despite advances in vascular diagnostics and surgical technique. Whether due to penetrating or blunt mechanisms, overall incidence of these injuries is low, whereas morbidity and mortality remain high. Despite collective experience from busy trauma centers, there still remain controversies regarding diagnostic evaluation, operative approach, and surgical treatment of these potentially devastating injuries. ⋯ Pros and cons of duplex ultrasonography and angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery injury are highlighted, and selective versus mandatory neck exploration for zone II penetrating injuries are discussed. Increasing awareness of blunt carotid artery injury is emphasized, including management dilemmas that frequently accompany this type of injury. In addition, we review interventional radiological techniques for the management of vertebral artery injury and surgical approaches for aortic arch branch vessel or major cervicothoracic vein injury.
-
HIT is a procoagulant disorder that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality if undetected and untreated. It occurs in approximately 5% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. HIT can be separated into two different types based on the clinical presentation and the pathophysiological mechanism. ⋯ Once suspected or diagnosed, all heparin therapy must be withdrawn. The thrombocytopenia will generally resolve within several days to a week. Minimizing the risk to the patient for developing HIT is the best form of prevention currently available.