Journal of neurotrauma
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2023
Validation of a Smartphone Pupillometry Application in Diagnosing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
The pupillary light reflex (PLR) is an important biomarker for the detection and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). We investigated the performance of PupilScreen, a smartphone-based pupillometry app, in classifying healthy control subjects and subjects with severe TBI in comparison to the current gold standard NeurOptics pupillometer (NPi-200 model with proprietary Neurological Pupil Index [NPi] TBI severity score). A total of 230 PLR video recordings taken using both the PupilScreen smartphone pupillometer and NeurOptics handheld device (NPi-200) pupillometer were collected from 33 subjects with severe TBI (sTBI) and 132 subjects who were healthy without self-reported neurological disease. ⋯ The proprietary NPi TBI severity score demonstrated greatest AUC value, F1 score, and sensitivity of 0.648, 0.567, and 50.9% respectively using a random forest classifier and greatest overall accuracy and specificity of 67.4% and 92.4% using a logistic regression model in the same classification task on the same dataset. The PupilScreen smartphone pupillometry app demonstrated binary healthy versus severe TBI classification ability greater than that of the NPi-200 proprietary NPi TBI severity score. These results may indicate the potential benefit of future study of this PupilScreen smartphone pupillometry application in comparison to the NPi-200 digital infrared pupillometer across the broader TBI spectrum, as well as in other neurological diseases.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2023
Screening for brain injury sustained in the context of intimate partner violence: Measure development and preliminary utility of the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire IPV Module.
Abstract Intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with risk for multi-etiology brain injury (BI), including repetitive head impacts, isolated traumatic brain injuries (TBI), and anoxic/hypoxic injury secondary to nonfatal strangulation (NFS). IPV-related injuries are often unreported, but evidence suggests that survivors are more likely to report when asked directly. There are currently no validated tools for screening of brain injury related to IPV that meet World Health Organization guidelines for this population. ⋯ We found that 9% of those who completed the core BISQ reported violent TBI (e.g., abuse, assault), whereas 19% of those who completed the BISQ+IPV immediately preceding the core BISQ reported non-IPV-related violent TBI on the core BISQ. These findings suggest that standard TBI screening tools are inadequate for identifying IPV-BI and structured cueing of IPV-related contexts yields greater reporting of both IPV- and non-IPV-related violent BI. When not queried directly, IPV-BI remains a hidden variable in TBI research studies.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2023
An MR elastography-based technique to assess the biomechanics of the skull-brain interface: repeatability and age-sex characteristics.
Increasing concerns have been raised about the long-term negative effects of subconcussive repeated head impact (RHI). To elucidate RHI injury mechanisms, many efforts have studied how head impacts affect the skull-brain biomechanics and have found that mechanical interactions at the skull-brain interface dampen and isolate brain motions by decoupling the brain from the skull. Despite intense interest, in vivo quantification of the functional state of the skull-brain interface remains difficult. ⋯ Except for the temporal lobe (p = 0.0087), there was no significant difference in NOSS between men and women. This work provides motivation for utilizing MRE as a non-invasive tool for quantifying the biomechanics of the skull-brain interface. It evaluated the age and sex dependence and may lead to a better understanding of the protective role and mechanisms of the skull-brain interface in RHI and TBI, as well as improve the accuracy of computational models in simulating the skull-brain interface.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2023
Observational StudyAssociations between peer relationships and self-esteem after childhood traumatic brain injury: exploring the mediating role of loneliness.
Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) can impact psycho-social functioning, including friendships and experiences of loneliness; however, few studies have explored associations between these factors and self-esteem. To address this gap, the objective of this study was to document inter-relationships between friendship quality, peer-related loneliness, and self-esteem 12 months post-injury. The sample in this prospective, longitudinal observational study consisted of 135 children, including 92 children with TBI (57 mild, 35 moderate-severe TBI) and 43 typically developing control (TDC) children. ⋯ In mediation models, poorer quality friendships were associated with greater peer-related loneliness, and greater peer-related loneliness was related to reduced athletic and social self-esteem, at 12 months post-TBI. Loneliness with peers mediated the effects of both friendship support and friendship satisfaction on children's social self-esteem. Our preliminary findings suggest that regular monitoring of social interactions post-TBI might facilitate early identification of children who are likely to benefit from interventions targeting peer-related loneliness, which in turn may lower risk for poorer self-esteem.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2023
Sample size, replicability, and pre-test likelihoods - essential, overlooked, and critical components of statistical inference - A Journal of Neurotrauma Guide to Statistical Methods and Study Design.
Perhaps one of the most overlooked components of statistical inference is the sample size. While in randomized controlled trials, power analysis is common and sample size justification is an integral component of the core statistical analysis plan, observational and laboratory research studies often rely on convenience samples and/or underpowered analyses. Insufficiently powered studies increase uncertainty associated with the results and limit interpretability. ⋯ Further, if the effect size is small, replication often requires sample sizes that are substantially larger than the original study. For most neurotrauma research, thousands of subjects are usually not required, but many studies do require substantially larger sample sizes than are typically presented in published research to increase replicability. In this methodological tutorial, choice of sample size, pre-test probability, and the concept of positive predictive value for scientific findings will be discussed, together with suggestions to improve replicability of neurotrauma research in the future.