Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Apr 2013
ReviewNoninvasive respiratory support in the perioperative period.
Pulmonary complications ranging from atelectasis to acute respiratory failure are common causes of poor perioperative outcomes. As the surgical population becomes increasingly at risk for pulmonary dysfunction due to increasing age and weight, development of an approach toward respiratory compromise in these patients is becoming ever more important. Given the utility of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) in acute respiratory failure, it is likewise likely to also be important in the perioperative period. ⋯ Noninvasive respiratory support should be considered an important adjunct in perioperative pulmonary care. Usage should be individually tailored in regard to timing and application modality specific to patient and surgical circumstances. More studies are needed, however, to determine the relationship demonstrated between short-term improvements in lung function and long-term outcomes.
-
This review is designed to update readers on recent discussions and research regarding vulnerable populations in medicine, including patients who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, queer, in prison or labeled with a stigmatizing complex medical disease. ⋯ Greater understanding of the cause of the health effects of being socioeconomically disadvantaged or being a member of a vulnerable population may be the first steps toward specific policy recommendations. Professional medical organizations and advocacy groups should raise awareness, provide education, publish guidelines and define the goals for the medical care for certain vulnerable populations.Vulnerable populations are at risk for disparate healthcare access and outcomes because of economic, cultural, ethnic or health characteristics. Vulnerable populations include patients who are racial or ethnic minorities, children, elderly, socioeconomically disadvantaged, underinsured or those with certain medical conditions. Members of vulnerable populations often have health conditions that are exacerbated by unnecessarily inadequate healthcare.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Apr 2013
ReviewInformed consent for special procedures: electroconvulsive therapy and psychosurgery.
Informed consent has become the cornerstone of the expression of patient's autonomy for ethical and sound patient-physician relationships. However, some severe psychiatric diseases markedly hinder the ability of selected patients to ensure a proper consent. Confronted with mentally disabled individuals whose condition may lead to violence or inflicting it on others, society must carry out its duty of protecting those who are particularly vulnerable, while respecting and protecting these disabled individuals. ⋯ Consent can be relatively easy to secure in selected patients who are often fully aware of their torments (such as those suffering from severe refractory depression of obsessive-compulsive disorders) whose suffering may be such that they are ready to accept, or for that matter demand, such actions. However, the duty of physicians is to realize that pains should always be taken to do as much good (and as little harm) as possible, while respecting the freedom of decision of those who seek to help.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Apr 2013
ReviewPredicting postoperative pulmonary complications in high-risk populations.
Our objective is to describe prediction models for surgical patients who have suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) at risk for postoperative respiratory complications and for surgical patients at risk for postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ⋯ Evidence is emerging that early identification of modifiable risk factors and implementation of 'protective' management strategies may lead to reduction of severe postoperative pulmonary complications.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Apr 2013
ReviewEthical considerations for discontinuing pacemakers and automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators at the end-of-life.
As the use of intracardiac devices has increased, the awareness of the burdens of the devices, especially the uncomfortable defibrillator shocks, has also increased. Some patients have requested device deactivation and some physicians have expressed reluctance to do so. This review will update physicians about the ethical acceptability of removal of intracardiac devices. ⋯ Physicians ought to initiate a deactivation conversation, ideally at the time of implantation. Sharing case studies about the deactivation process will enable physicians to enhance their ability to guide patients and family through thoughtful decision-making. Guidelines for deactivation should be promulgated throughout institutions that serve patients with intracardiac devices.