Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
Fluid resuscitation in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock is controversially discussed in the literature. The coincidence of brain injury complicates management of these patients. This article summarizes the current knowledge on nonblood component fluid resuscitation and choice of fluids in patients with multiple trauma. ⋯ To date no large-scale clinical studies exist to either support or refute the use of nonblood component fluid resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in trauma patients. The optimal choice of fluid remains to be determined, but existing evidence suggests avoiding crystalloids in favor of hypertonic solutions. The role of modern, iso-oncotic colloids in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock has not yet been sufficiently defined. In patients with concomitant brain injury, arterial hypotension must be avoided and infusion of hypotonic solutions is obsolete, whereas administration of hypertonic solutions may exert beneficial effects beyond hemodynamic stabilization.
-
This review focuses on the role of various intracranial monitoring technologies in the diagnosis and therapy of traumatic brain injury injury. ⋯ Increased adherence to guideline-based and protocol-driven neurointensive care utilizing multimodality in monitoring technology for patients with severe traumatic brain injury is likely to give clinicians increased insight into the elusive mechanisms underlying the complex pathophysiology of this disease process and may further improve outcomes in this patient population.
-
In the current era of limited resources, organizations are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of their care. To analyze the cost-effectiveness of a physiologic monitor, one must first determine what negative outcome will be reduced or what positive outcome will be promoted. For example, if one was studying the cost-effectiveness of the pulse oximeter, it would be important to state whether the endpoint is prevention of hypoxic events or prevention of myocardial infarction. One would then need outcome data demonstrating the incidence of the chosen endpoint with and without the monitor. With these data, one can begin to construct a model for cost-effectiveness. Like many medical technologies, the bispectral index (BIS) monitor has recently been the subject of several articles which study its cost-effectiveness. This review examines the rationale of cost-effectiveness analyses and their application specifically to the BIS monitor. ⋯ Given the trivial cost of the BIS and the proven benefits demonstrated in prospective randomized studies, we consider its use justified in every general anesthetic.
-
It has become clear from experimental data that prolonged mechanical ventilation can induce diaphragm dysfunction, also known as ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. In this article we will discuss most recent understanding on ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction and data on diaphragm dysfunction in patients. ⋯ Diaphragm dysfunction occurs in patients, especially when ventilated with controlled modes of ventilation that minimize diaphragm activity. Time on the ventilator seems to be one of the biggest risk factors resulting in difficulties in weaning patients and prolonging time on the ventilator. Future trials should investigate whether improved patient-ventilator synchrony can reduce ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction and decrease weaning failure.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Apr 2011
ReviewInhalational or total intravenous anaesthesia: is total intravenous anaesthesia useful and are there economic benefits?
The comparison of inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia has been the subject of many controlled trials and meta-analyses. These reported diverse endpoints typically including measures of the speed and quality of induction of anaesthesia, haemodynamic changes, operating conditions, various measures of awakening, postoperative nausea and vomiting and discharge from the recovery area and from hospital as well as recovery of psychomotor function. In a more patient-focused Health Service, measures with greater credibility are overall patient satisfaction, time to return to work and long-term morbidity and mortality. In practice, studies using easier to measure proxy endpoints dominate - even though the limitations of such research are well known. ⋯ Economic analysis of anaesthesia is complex and most published studies are naive, focusing on drug acquisition costs and facility timings, real health economics are much more difficult. Preferred outcome measures would be whole institution costs or the ability to reliably add an extra case to an operating list, close an operating room and reduce the number of operating sessions offered or permanently decrease staffing. Alongside this, however, potential long-term patient outcomes should be considered.