Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
-
A systematic course/clerkship peer-review process was developed to meet several objectives: improvement of quality of course/clerkship, enhancement of understanding of individual course and overall curricular content, improvement of communication and collaboration between basic science and clinical disciplines across campuses, provision of forum to address curricular concerns of students and faculty, facilitation of data collection for LCME reviews and the AAMC CurrMIT project; and monitoring curricular equivalency at multiple clinical sites. ⋯ The systematic course/clerkship peer-review process has been a success, although there was initial resistance to "outside review." We have not yet completed one cycle of comprehensive course reviews but already faculty and administration have a better understanding of individual course and overall curriculum content. Faculty have developed working relationships and are sharing educational strategies across disciplines and campuses, and identifying innovative collaborations. The annual review process is now perceived to lack depth and is under reconsideration.
-
The potential of distance learning technology to deliver educational programs in which instruction and evaluation are of a consistent and high standard across multiple settings is hampered by a lack of instructional design models. In response, we developed the HEAL (Heuristic for Electronic Asynchronous Learning) model for designing online curricula. ⋯ Students in alternating clerkship blocks complete the online clerkship. Their performance is compared with that of students who complete a face-to-face diabetes curriculum, but no curriculum on EBM or medical humanism. After nearly a year (105 students), compared with the non-online group, students completing the online clerkship demonstrated greater gains in reported EBM skills from preto post-clerkship, larger increases in mean score (from pre to post) on a medical-humanism aptitude scale, and higher scores on a post-clerkship diabetes management assessment (all comparisons p <.05). The online clerkship will become a permanent part of our clerkship and we have begun to use HEAL to design other online courses, including continuing education courses.
-
To describe an interdisciplinary team's experience using a six-stage curriculum-development model to assess an integrated curriculum in radiology. ⋯ Schools and faculty are often faced with the need to develop and implement innovative curricula rapidly. Periodic assessments by oversight groups such as curriculum committees identify where additional information is required to assess the performances of learners and curricula in rapidly-changing clinical contexts. In this study a three-member team with focused expertise in radiology, anatomy, and medicine/medical education conducted a rapid in-depth review of an integrated radiology curriculum "hosted" by several departments. A curriculum-development model provided a template for analysis of needs, objectives, methods, resources, and assessment measures for all curricula, and guided the team's recommendations for targeted revision. Each team member brought expertise in some element of the integrated curriculum or in curriculum design. The team identified what integrated curricular elements had not been designed adequately, what could no longer be supported with current resources, and how curricular revisions could be assessed for adequacy.
-
The mini-clinical evaluation exercise, or mini-CEX, assesses residents' history and physical examination skills. To date, no study has assessed the validity of the mini-CEX (mCEX) evaluation format. The authors' objective was to determine the reliability and validity of the mCEX evaluation format. ⋯ This study suggests that the mCEX is a feasible and reliable evaluation tool. The validity of the mCEX is supported by the strong correlations between mCEX scores and corresponding ABIM MEF scores as well as the ITE.
-
With increased budget constraints, academic health centers (AHCs) have turned their focus on physician compensation. While many AHCs are concerned that compensation programs driven primarily by revenue generation will have a negative impact on their academic mission, little information is available to support this. The authors examined the effects on teaching and clinical productivity of an innovative compensation program for pediatrics primary care faculty at an AHC and related those effects to national standards for productivity. ⋯ Successful productivity-based physician compensation programs can be developed for AHCs.