Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology
-
The measurement of specific serum immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and the skin prick test (SPT) are accepted tools in the diagnostic work-up of suspected food allergy. Often only one of the methods is used to determine sensitization; however, it is still under debate whether these two methods can be used interchangeably. ⋯ The concordance between SPT and sIgE is surprisingly low for cow's milk and hen's egg on an individual basis. Therefore, the tests should not be used interchangeably. Especially in children who receive a negative test result the alternative test should also be used. Furthermore, our data indicate again that oral food challenges are still the method of choice to diagnose food allergies.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Safety and efficacy of a CXCR2 antagonist in patients with severe asthma and sputum neutrophils: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Increased numbers of neutrophils are reported in the airways of patients with severe asthma. It is not clear if they contribute to the lack of control and severity. There are currently no strategies to investigate this by decreasing neutrophil numbers in the airways. ⋯ This new treatment provides an opportunity to investigate the role of neutrophils in severe asthma with potential clinical benefits. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to evaluate the impact on other outcomes of asthma including exacerbations.
-
Asthma, and severe asthma, in particular, is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease. While traditional views of asthma have centered around a childhood onset disease with an allergic component, several large scale network studies are now confirming that severe asthma can present in multiple different ways, only 30-50% of which meet traditional childhood onset allergic criteria. To understand the different groups better, initial studies have attempted to define phenotypes of severe asthma. ⋯ As biological characteristics are identified, phenotypes should continue to evolve towards asthma endotypes. The identification of these endotypes, either by matching biology, genetics and therapeutic responses to therapy with clinically or statistically defined phenotypes or through unbiased genetic and genomic approaches, remains limited. Moving forward, this integration of genetics, biology and clinical characteristics should substantially enhance our ability to effectively treat complex heterogeneous diseases, such as severe asthma.
-
Patients with severe refractory asthma have not achieved asthma control, even with high doses of ICS, usually in combination with LABAs and other maintenance treatments. ⋯ Patients with severe refractory asthma have the greatest unmet treatment needs to improve asthma control and reduce exacerbation risk. New treatment approaches have been identified which will benefit subsets of these patients. Phenotyping patients is necessary to select those likely to benefit.
-
Severe asthmatics often exhibit poor control despite high doses of inhaled corticosteroids with or without systemic corticosteroids and suffer from persistent symptoms and/or recurrent exacerbations. Five to ten percentage of the asthmatic population falls within this category. Patients with severe asthma are a heterogeneous group and should be investigated to confirm the diagnosis, identify comorbidities, exclude alternative diagnoses, together with an evaluation of treatment adherence and side-effects from medications. ⋯ Severe asthma consists of different phenotypes that need defining. Investigation of severe asthma should bring into the open the various characteristics of the disease that could point to particular phenotype. Inclusion of investigations based on transcriptomics and proteomics should expand, improve classification and understanding of severe asthma, with the ultimate hope of finding more effective treatments and a step towards personalized medicine.