Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
-
With a focus on landmark investigations, common themes, and unique and innovative contributions to the literature, we provide a synopsis of the 2011 literature pertaining to general advances in neurosurgical procedures and perioperative care and anesthetic management of neurosurgical patients.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 2011
ReviewLund concept for the management of traumatic brain injury: a physiological principle awaiting stronger evidence.
The "Lund concept" involving a "volume-targeted" strategy for intracranial pressure control originated in the University of Lund, Sweden, more than 20 years ago and has remained controversial ever since. It is based on the premise that the blood-brain barrier is disrupted after traumatic brain injury and cerebral autoregulation is impaired; hence, the transcapillary water exchange is determined by the differences in hydrostatic and colloid osmotic pressure between the intracapillary and extracapillary compartments. The Lund concept argues that the only way of inducing transcapillary reabsorption of interstitial fluid is to control the transcapillary osmotic and hydrostatic differences and utilizes a complex combination pharmacotherapy involving β1-antagonist metoprolol, α2-agonist clonidine, low-dose thiopental, dihydroergotamine, and maintenance of colloid osmotic pressure by red blood cell transfusion and albumin administration. ⋯ It deemphasizes the effect of secondary cerebral ischemia and contradicts the common treatment goal of cerebral blood flow optimization by augmentation of cerebral perfusion pressure. In fact, good evidence exists against the use of many individual components of the Lund therapy in traumatic brain injury. In the absence of strong evidence to support it, the Lund concept is unlikely to gain acceptance elsewhere.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 2011
ReviewThe Lund concept for the treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Two different main concepts for the treatment of a severe traumatic brain injury have been established during the last 15 years, namely the more conventional concept recommended in well-established guidelines (eg, U. S. Guideline, European Guideline, Addelbrook's Guideline from Cambridge), on the one hand, and the Lund concept from the University Hospital of Lund, Sweden, on the other. ⋯ Although conventional guidelines are restricted to clinical data from meta-analytic surveys, the physiological approach of Lund therapy finds support in both experimental and clinical studies. It offers a wider base and can also provide recommendations regarding fluid therapy, lung protection, optimal hemoglobin concentration, temperature control, the use of decompressive craniotomy, and ventricular drainage. This paper puts forward arguments in support of Lund therapy.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2011
ReviewPRO: the "Lund concept" for treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Two different main concepts for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury have been established during the last 15 years, namely the more conventional concept recommended in well-established guidelines (eg, the US Guideline, European Guideline, Addelbrook's Guideline from Cambridge) on the one hand, and the Lund concept from the University Hospital of Lund, Sweden on the other. Owing to the lack of well-controlled randomized outcome studies comparing these 2 main therapeutic approaches, we cannot conclude that one is better than the other. This study is the PRO part in a PRO-CON debate on the Lund concept in the present journal. ⋯ Although conventional guidelines are restricted to clinical data from meta-analytic surveys, the physiological approach of the Lund therapy finds support in both experimental and clinical studies. It offers a wider base and can also give recommendations regarding fluid therapy, lung protection, optimal hemoglobin concentration, temperature control, the use of decompressive craniotomy, and ventricular drainage. This study puts forward arguments in support of the Lund therapy.
-
We provide a summary of the 2010 literature pertinent to the care of neurosurgical patients and those requiring neurocritical care. In addition, we address topics in the basic neurosciences as they relate to neuroanesthesiology. ⋯ We will review the broad categories of general neuroanesthesiology, with particular emphasis on cerebral physiology and pharmacology, intracranial hemorrhage, carotid artery disease, spine surgery, traumatic brain injury, neuroprotection, and neurotoxicity. When selecting articles for inclusion in this review, we gave priority to those publications that had: (1) new or novel information, (2) clinical utility, (3) a study design possessing appropriate statistical power, and/or (4) meaningful, unambiguous conclusions.