Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Research into the treatment of hypertrophic burn scar is hampered by the variability and subjectivity of existing outcome measures. This study aims to measure the inter- and intra-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools. ⋯ The objective scar measures demonstrated acceptable to excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and performed better than the subjective scar scales.
-
Patients with burn injuries are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This predisposition is secondary to the endothelial injury, hyper-coagulable state and stasis (Virchow's triad) associated with burn injury. Although the true incidence of VTE in burn patients has not been adequately quantified, symptomatic VTE occurs in 0.2-7% of this population. VTE prophylaxis has proven clinical effectiveness and affords a reduction in the morbidity associated with such events, but the benefits and risk of complications need to be balanced in order to provide the best quality of care. Owing to the lack of prospective data on VTE in burns, practice varies greatly, not only internationally, but also between local burns services. Our aim was to better understand current VTE practice within United Kingdom (UK) burn care services by performing a comprehensive survey. ⋯ Although the true burden of VTE in burn patients is unknown, we recognise that they are a population at risk. In addition to changes in the inflammatory and clotting pathways associated with thermal injury, prolonged hospital stay, ventilatory support, multiple surgeries, numerous central venous cannulations and reduced mobility all multiply this risk. The risk associated with the administration of heparin (bleeding complications and heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia) is low and can be reduced even further to 0.1% by the use of LMWH. The risk of symptomatic VTE is far greater, therefore the benefits of VTE prophylaxis would seem to outweigh the risks of not undertaking prophylactic measures. A higher LMWH dose and routine monitoring of anti-factor Xa levels are useful for acute burn patients. Two previous surveys, performed in Canada and the United States of America (USA), found routine administration of VTE prophylaxis to be 50% and 76% respectively. Of the 71 centres in the USA participating in the survey, 30% used a combination of sequential compression devices (SCD) and heparin and 24% did not provide VTE prophylaxis at all. A lack of prospective data on VTE in burn patients appears to be associated with diverse practice, and consensus on this topic could ensure that the potential morbidity caused by VTE is reduced. A clinical tool for identifying patients at risk and guidelines for management will standardise practice, which in turn should allow us to improve and maintain high quality care for burn patients.
-
This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether adipose tissue loss and reduced vitamin D levels following severe burn injury are associated with pathologic scar formation and biomechanical scar properties. ⋯ Adipose tissue loss and decreased 25(OH) vitamin D levels following burn injury were related to scar rigidity and slow interstitial fluid shifting in hypertrophic scars.
-
Modern burn care strives for new means to guarantee optimised wound healing. Several studies have shown a correlation between the pH value in a (burn) wound and successful wound healing. A multitude of devices to monitor pH is available, all requiring direct wound contact and removal of the dressing for pH monitoring. The aim of this feasibility study was to create a sterile and easy to handle method for pH monitoring while simultaneously using an advanced wound dressing. ⋯ Since the pH of a (burn) wound can have a significant influence on wound healing, a pH indicator was successfully linked to an advanced, temporary, alloplastic wound dressing material. We were able to show the possibility of pH monitoring by the dressing itself. Additional testing, including studies with large case numbers for optimisation are necessary before clinical implementation.