Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Multicenter Study
Patient-reported scar quality in paediatric and adult burn patients: A long-term multicentre follow-up study.
Burn scar maturation can take several years but is generally studied shortly after injury. Therefore, we investigated patient-reported scar quality up to 5-7 years post-burn. ⋯ Two-thirds of patients with burns up to 20 % TBSA scored the quality of their scars worse at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn. Whether this corresponds to increased dissatisfaction with scars in the long term should be further investigated. These new insights add to the body of knowledge on scar maturation and underscores the importance of discussing patients' expectations.
-
Pediatric thermal injuries can have profound physical and psychological effects. Long-term care, including wound dressing selection, significantly impacts outcomes. This study compared treatment related variables and long-term results of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) and polyurethane foam (PU-foam) dressings in pediatric burn care. ⋯ BNC dressing benefits include significantly fewer anesthesia procedures, a reduced number of inpatient dressing changes and a shorter hospital stays, supporting the use of BNC dressing. Long-term scar outcomes with BNC are comparable to established dressings like PU-foam. Further randomized trials are necessary to confirm these findings.
-
While there is no consensus on the best surgical procedure for post-burn axillary contractures, it is crucial to consider the elongation rate along the scar axis as a useful measurement index for determining the optimal surgical approach. The square flap and five flap z-plasty techniques are commonly employed scar lengthening procedures to address scar contractures in the axilla. These approaches successfully disrupt the linear scar, leading to significant elongation while reducing transverse tension. Our study aims to compare the increase in band length and functional results of these two approaches for treating post-burn contractures in the axilla. ⋯ The square flap technique is considered a better alternative to the commonly used 5-flap Z-plasty method because it can achieve higher elongation in the contracture band, restore joint function, and create optimal shape when dealing with single linear band contractures over the axilla.
-
The overwhelming burden of burns in low-income (LIC) and low-middle-income (LMIC) countries has been well-documented. Though best global practice is for major burns to be treated in burn units, the prohibitive cost makes it difficult. In this article we attempt to present the improvement in outcome recorded over a period of 3 years as we transitioned from nursing our burns patients in the general surgical wards (Group A), then a separate cubicle within the wards (Group B) and then an isolated burn ward (Group C). ⋯ Most LICs and LMICs do not have functional health insurance schemes for burns patients and overall resources allocated for healthcare cannot support a state-of-the-art burn unit. Our report attempts to encourage such countries to adapt global practice to their economic reality. Minimal changes like an isolated burn ward, separate shower room for wound dressings, strict hygiene practices, and limiting visitor traffic may go a long way to improve burn patient outcome.
-
Severe burn injuries (SBIs) are known to pose a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and the healthcare system. Yet, scarce data on the short and long-term clinical and economic impacts of these injuries limit the development of evidence-informed strategies and policies to better care for these patients. To fill in this gap, we adapted a previously validated self-reported out-of-pocket cost measurement questionnaire, the Cost for Patients Questionnaire (CoPaQ), to the severe burn injury survivor context. ⋯ Summative content analysis was used to identify items needing to be modified, deleted, or added. Based on this information, a preliminary version of a Burn Injury Cost for Patients Questionnaire (BI-CoPaQ) was developed and subsequently pre-tested on a small sample of SBIs survivors. Further validation of this tool will be required before BI-CoPaQ can be used as the standard for the estimation of the financial burden of SBIs in this population.