Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Despite the multitude of preventative methods, postburn hand contractures are poorly controlled and often require surgery. However, there is no consensus on which hand reconstruction technique is most efficacious. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of available postburn hand contracture reconstruction techniques over the long term and to evaluate the quality of current literature. Effectiveness is assessed with functional improvement, increase of skin surface area, and scar quality/enhanced cosmesis. ⋯ No consensus remains on the superiority of a single reconstruction technique. Meticulous preoperative planning and intensive rehabilitation are vital. A stepwise approach, considering individual patient and contracture characteristics and the limitations of each technique, should be followed. Well-designed and conducted future studies, utilizing reliable and validated contracture description methods and outcome assessment, are now imperative.
-
Despite the multitude of preventative methods, postburn hand contractures are poorly controlled and often require surgery. However, there is no consensus on which hand reconstruction technique is most efficacious. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of available postburn hand contracture reconstruction techniques over the long term and to evaluate the quality of current literature. Effectiveness is assessed with functional improvement, increase of skin surface area, and scar quality/enhanced cosmesis. ⋯ No consensus remains on the superiority of a single reconstruction technique. Meticulous preoperative planning and intensive rehabilitation are vital. A stepwise approach, considering individual patient and contracture characteristics and the limitations of each technique, should be followed. Well-designed and conducted future studies, utilizing reliable and validated contracture description methods and outcome assessment, are now imperative.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Outcome comparison of the most commonly employed wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burns ≥50% TBSA - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Early wound coverage is one of the most essential factors influencing the survival of extensively burned patients, especially those with a total body surface area (TBSA) burned greater than 50 %. In patients with limited donor sites available for autografting, techniques such as the Meek micrograft procedure or cultured epidermal allografts (CEA) have proven to be viable alternatives. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of different wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burn injuries ≥ 50 % TBSA in the past 17 years. ⋯ Comparison of the four techniques highlighted differences in terms of all outcomes assessed, and each technique was associated with different advantages. Interestingly autografting, the option with the highest graft take rate, was also associated with the highest mortality. This study not only serves to provide the first comparison of the most commonly used techniques in major burn reconstruction, but also highlights the need for prospective studies that directly compare the efficacy of the different techniques to ultimately establish whether a true superior option exists.
-
Advancements in resuscitative care and burn surgery have improved survival rates after extensive burn injuries, shifting focus to enhancing the quality of survival. Conventional treatment with split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) presents limitations such as donor-site morbidity, limited availability in extensive burn injuries, and hypertrophic scarring. Tissue engineering aims to address these drawbacks by developing optimal skin substitutes. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current applications of cultured cells in burn surgery, encompassing diverse approaches and addressing existing challenges to enhance burn wound management and improve patient outcomes. ⋯ Results are promising, though standardization of cultured skin substitutes and robust clinical trials with larger populations and appropriate comparators are still lacking.
-
Advancements in resuscitative care and burn surgery have improved survival rates after extensive burn injuries, shifting focus to enhancing the quality of survival. Conventional treatment with split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) presents limitations such as donor-site morbidity, limited availability in extensive burn injuries, and hypertrophic scarring. Tissue engineering aims to address these drawbacks by developing optimal skin substitutes. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current applications of cultured cells in burn surgery, encompassing diverse approaches and addressing existing challenges to enhance burn wound management and improve patient outcomes. ⋯ Results are promising, though standardization of cultured skin substitutes and robust clinical trials with larger populations and appropriate comparators are still lacking.