Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior
-
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. · Oct 2005
Ultra-low-dose naltrexone reduces the rewarding potency of oxycodone and relapse vulnerability in rats.
Ultra-low-dose opioid antagonists have been shown to enhance opioid analgesia and alleviate opioid tolerance and dependence. Our present studies in male Sprague-Dawley rats assessed the abuse potential of oxycodone+ultra-low-dose naltrexone (NTX) versus oxycodone alone. The lowest NTX dose (1 pg/kg/infusion), but not slightly higher doses (10 and 100 pg/kg/infusion), enhanced oxycodone (0.1 mg/kg/infusion) intravenous self-administration, suggesting a reduced rewarding potency per infusion. ⋯ During self-administration on a progressive-ratio schedule, animals self-administering oxycodone (0.1 mg/kg/infusion)+NTX (1 pg/kg/infusion) reached a "break-point" sooner and showed a trend toward less responding compared to rats self-administering oxycodone alone (0.1 mg/kg/infusion). In the final experiment, the addition of ultra-low-dose NTX (10 pg/kg, s.c.) enhanced the acute stimulatory effect of oxycodone (1 mg/kg, s.c.), as well as locomotor sensitization produced by repeated oxycodone administration (7 x 1 mg/kg, s.c.). In summary, this work shows that ultra-low-dose NTX co-treatment augments the locomotor effects of oxycodone as it enhances opioid analgesia, but reduces oxycodone's rewarding potency and subsequent vulnerability to relapse.
-
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. · Sep 2005
Cocaine and methamphetamine produce different patterns of subjective and cardiovascular effects.
The stimulant effects of cocaine and methamphetamine are mediated by changes in synaptic concentrations of brain monoamines; however, the drugs alter monoamine levels via different mechanisms. This study examined the subjective and cardiovascular responses produced by investigational administration of cocaine or methamphetamine, in order to examine the onset and patterns of subjective and cardiovascular responses. Subjects included 14 non-treatment seeking cocaine-dependent and 11 non-treatment seeking methamphetamine-dependent volunteers. ⋯ Cardiovascular effects of cocaine and methamphetamine had similar onset, but effects of cocaine tended to decline more rapidly. Overall, the results reveal differences in the onset, pattern, and duration of subjective and cardiovascular responses following cocaine or methamphetamine administration in stimulant addicted patients. We predict that these differences may impact drug use and relapse patterns, and may have implications in medications development for these addictive disorders.
-
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. · Sep 2005
Evaluation of pain-related behavior, bone destruction and effectiveness of fentanyl, sufentanil, and morphine in a murine model of cancer pain.
The present study was conducted to evaluate the pain development and bone destruction during bone cancer growth in a murine model of bone cancer pain and to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of fentanyl, sufentanil, and morphine in this model. C3H/HeNCrl mice were inoculated into the intramedullary space of the femur with osteolytic NCTC 2472 fibrosarcoma cells, and followed during a 3-week period to assess pain behaviors (spontaneous lifting and limb-use during forced ambulation on rotarod) and bone destruction (parameters indicative of bone lesions determined by microCT-scans of the tumor-bearing bones) during bone cancer growth. ⋯ A complete relief from pain-related behaviors was achieved with the following doses: > or =0.16 mg/kg fentanyl, 0.02 mg/kg sufentanil, and 20 mg/kg morphine. In conclusion, the results showed a clear link between tumor growth-induced bone destruction and behavioral pain manifestations, the latter was effectively controlled by the opioids fentanyl, sufentanil, and morphine.
-
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. · Jul 2005
Comparative StudyCross-tolerance and mu agonist efficacy in pigeons treated with LAAM or buprenorphine.
The mechanism responsible for decreased opioid use during opioid substitution therapy is not fully understood. To examine whether l-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM) or buprenorphine attenuate behavioral effects of opioids through cross-tolerance, discriminative stimulus effects of high and low efficacy mu agonists were examined following 3- or 7-day treatment with LAAM or buprenorphine in pigeons discriminating between saline and heroin or between saline and buprenorphine, respectively. Heroin, buprenorphine and nalbuphine occasioned high levels of drug-appropriate responding in both groups; kappa opioids and non-opioids occasioned predominantly saline-appropriate responding. ⋯ Following discontinuation of buprenorphine treatment, the potency in occasioning buprenorphine-key responding was decreased for nalbuphine and unchanged for buprenorphine and heroin. Thus, greater cross-tolerance developed from LAAM and buprenorphine to low efficacy mu agonists as compared to a higher efficacy agonist. Failure of LAAM and buprenorphine treatment to modify the effects of heroin, under conditions that attenuate the effects of lower efficacy mu opioids, provides a possible rationale for why heroin abuse persists in some patients receiving large doses of agonists in substitution therapy.
-
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. · Jun 2005
ReviewEndocannabinoid signaling system and brain reward: emphasis on dopamine.
The brain's reward circuitry consists of an "in series" circuit of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), nucleus accumbens (Acb), and that portion of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) which links the VTA and Acb. Drugs which enhance brain reward (and have derivative addictive potential) have common actions on this core DA reward system and on animal behaviors relating to its function. ⋯ However, it is now clear that cannabinoids activate these brain reward processes and reward-related behaviors in similar fashion to other reward-enhancing drugs. This brief review discusses the roles that endogenous cannabinoids (especially activation of the CB1 receptor) may play within the core reward system, and concludes that while cannabinoids activate the reward pathways in a manner consistent with other reward-enhancing drugs, the neural mechanisms by which this occurs may differ.