Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
-
Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Oct 2002
Review Comparative StudyPatient selection for lung volume reduction surgery: is outcome predictable?
Patient selection for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) relies on sound physiologic concepts and experience from large case series. LVRS should be considered in severely symptomatic emphysema with marked airflow obstruction and hyperinflation despite optimal medical management, and in the absence of major comorbidities associated with excessive perioperative risks. Qualitative estimation of functional benefit from LVRS in suitable candidates has been based on functional criteria (e.g., high inspiratory conductance, high residual volume/total lung capacity ratio), on heterogeneity of emphysema assessed by computed tomography (CT) or perfusion scans, and on severity of emphysema assessed by CT or impaired diffusing capacity. Selection strategies relying on such criteria have provided favorable functional results at a low mortality, but further validation of potential outcome predictors in prospective trials is needed.
-
Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Oct 2002
ReviewThe challenge of pediatric cardiac services in the developing world.
Pediatric cardiac services are too expensive for most developing nations. Problems other than cardiac disease take priority when it comes to budget allocations. Poor health infrastructure and referral systems, malnutrition, and the HIV/AIDS pandemic aggravate the situation, and the increasing economic divide is threatening what services do exist. We highlight how the practice of pediatric cardiac surgery in South Africa compares with first-world standards and outline some of the problems faced by pediatric cardiac services in developing nations.
-
Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) continues to stimulate controversy and spirited discussion. The purpose of the operation is to palliate dyspnea and improve functional status and quality of life for highly selected patients with emphysema. The value of LVRS as a palliative procedure is clearly dependent on the surgeon's ability to minimize the frequency and severity of postoperative complications. This article investigates the sources of morbidity and mortality after LVRS and reports techniques to avoid and manage such complications.
-
Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jul 2002
ReviewThe significance of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.
Atrial fibrillation is present in close to 50% of all patients undergoing surgery for mitral valve disease.(1-3) However, surgical correction of atrial fibrillation in patients with other cardiac pathology that requires surgical intervention such as mitral valve disease was never considered as a standard approach. The Maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation was introduced in 1987 and was performed safely in hundreds of patients with excellent outcomes.(4-7) As a result, several centers have begun to combine the Maze procedure with other cardiac procedures, especially mitral valve surgery, without adding undue operative risk to patients.(8) When properly performed, the results with this combined approach have been excellent.(9,10)