Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntramuscular low-dose ketamine versus pethidine for postoperative pain treatment after thoracic surgery.
In a double-blind prospective study the effects of low-dose intramuscular ketamine (1 mg/kg) were compared to pethidine (1 mg/kg) in the treatment of pain after pulmonary surgery. Thirty patients were admitted to the study and postoperatively randomized to either a ketamine or a pethidine group. The analgesic effect was evaluated using a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 denoted no pain and 10 severe pain. ⋯ Mean arterial pressures remained unchanged and the respiratory frequencies were similar in the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions was low and not significantly different between the groups. The findings indicate that low-dose intramuscular ketamine is a potent analgesic for postoperative analgesia following thoracic surgery and that it has no respiratory depressive effect.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialInjection pain, cardiovascular changes and recovery following induction of anaesthesia with propofol in combination with alfentanil or lignocaine in children.
The effect of pretreatment with alfentanil 10 (Alf10), 15 (Alf15) or 20 (Alf20) micrograms.kg-1 on reducing injection pain caused by propofol was compared with lignocaine 10 mg mixed with propofol (Lign). This double-blind, double-dummy and randomized study included 100 children with a mean age of 4.3 +/- 0.6 years, 25 children in each group, undergoing minor otolaryngological surgery. The children were premedicated orally with midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.03 mg.kg-1. ⋯ Both 1% lignocaine 10 mg and alfentanil 15 micrograms.kg-1 reduced injection pain significantly compared with alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1. Pretreatment with alfentanil significantly diminished haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation. Furthermore, the concomitant use of alfentanil and propofol caused transient severe bradycardia and a significant decrease in heart rate after laryngoscopy.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1992
A regression model for identifying patients at high risk of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea during spinal anesthesia.
We analyzed the predictive value of a number of demographic and anesthesiological variables with respect to the three most common complications during spinal anesthesia: hypotension, bradycardia, and nausea. A stepwise logistic regression model was created, using data from a prospective study of 1752 patients to combine the predictive value of all entry variables. The highest risk factors for hypotension were: age greater than or equal to 50, a sensory level above Th6, receiving bupivacaine as a local anesthetic, body mass index greater than or equal to 30, and receiving opiate as a premedication. ⋯ Females and those with a high sensory level or receiving opiate as a premedication were at significant risk of nausea. The model was also reliably predictive for a separate group of 200 consecutive spinal anesthesia patients. Thus, the risk model may be clinically useful in identifying high-risk patients requiring additional attention.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA dose-range study of intrathecal meperidine combined with bupivacaine.
Twenty-one patients were included in a randomized study to receive either 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine alone or combined with 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 or 0.5 mg.kg-1 meperidine for spinal anaesthesia. Sensory blockade was assessed by pin prick, motor blockade by the Bromage scale, and postoperative analgesia by VAS scores and by the time before the first demand for analgesia. Spinal meperidine did not change the duration of sensory blockade, but induced a dose-related increase in postoperative efficient analgesia. Spinal meperidine might be considered as a means to obtain postoperative analgesia in the hours immediately following surgery.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialHaemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia with slow continuous infusion or single dose of plain bupivacaine.
Forty elderly patients, scheduled for orthopaedic surgery of the hip or knee were studied. Twenty patients received a single-dose spinal anaesthesia with 3 ml of plain 0.5% bupivacaine (SDSA group). Twenty patients received continuous spinal anaesthesia using a 32- or 22-gauge catheter. ⋯ The mean maximum decreases in CVP and MAP were quite similar in the CSA and SDSA group (2.1 vs 2.8 mmHg (0.3 vs 0.4 kPa) and 17 vs 21 mmHg (2.3 vs 2.8 kPa), respectively) (n.s.). Six patients in the SDSA group and four patients in the CSA group needed sympathomimetic medication. It is concluded that titration of bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia caused only minor haemodynamic changes which were similar to those after single-dose spinal bupivacaine.