Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialInduction and recovery characteristics of propofol, thiopental and etomidate.
Propofol, thiopental and etomidate, with 20 patients in each group, were compared for anesthesia of short duration in women undergoing termination of pregnancy, with respect to: 1: pain on injection (equally often after propofol and etomidate, but more rarely after thiopental); 2: apnea following induction (no difference); 3: involuntary muscular movements more frequent after etomidate); 4: blood pressure (larger drop after propofol); 5: heart rate (greater increase after thiopental); 6: time to eye opening on command (longer after propofol); 7: Steward score on eye opening (no difference); 8: coin counting after 15, 30 and 60 min (performance better after propofol at 15 and 30 min, producing even shorter times than preoperatively at 60 min); 9: reaction time after 15, 30 and 60 min (performance better after propofol, producing even shorter times than preoperatively at 60 min. It is concluded that the faster recovery gives propofol an advantage over thiopental and etomidate in outpatient anesthesia.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 1989
Reversal of postoperative somnolence using a two-rate infusion of physostigmine.
In order to antagonize immediate postoperative somnolence, 24 surgical patients were given a two-rate infusion of physostigmine, aiming at a constant plasma concentration in the range of 1 to 10 ng/ml. Plasma concentrations of physostigmine were determined during infusion and after infusion and the effects of physostigmine on analgesia and postoperative sedation, and its side effects were monitored throughout. On the 1st postoperative day some of the patients (n = 8) were given 5 mg physostigmine orally, after which plasma concentrations as well as effects were measured. ⋯ After oral physostigmine administration the following morning, the majority of patients experienced side effects such as nausea and abdominal pain. In conclusion, physostigmine given as infusion antagonizes postoperative somnolence. However, the arousal effect was considered not better than that resulting from a bolus dose of the drug, although the infusion regimen allowed a prolonged clinical effect duration.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 1989
Comparative StudyThe association between the neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant hyperthermia.
The neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is an uncommon but dangerous complication of treatment with neuroleptic drugs. A primary defect in skeletal muscle has been suggested in view of similarities in the clinical presentations of NMS and anaesthetic-induced malignant hyperthermia (MH). The in vitro halothane-caffeine contracture tests are the most reliable method of identifying individuals susceptible to MH. ⋯ The response to halothane and caffeine exposure of skeletal muscle from NMS and control subjects was the same and significantly different from that of muscle from patients susceptible to MH. Furthermore, muscle from subjects in NMS and control group responded similarly to increasing concentrations of chlorpromazine. These results do not point towards an association between NMS and MH.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Oct 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of the effects of continuous intrapleural vs epidural administration of 0.5% bupivacaine on pain, metabolic response and pulmonary function following cholecystectomy.
Twenty patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were prospectively randomised to receive either intrapleural (bolus 20 ml followed by 10 ml/h) or thoracic epidural (bolus 9 ml followed by 5 ml/h) bupivacaine 0.5% for 8 h postoperatively to assess the effect of these two techniques on pain, pulmonary function and the surgical stress response. As assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS), both groups received good but not total pain relief. Both groups had a 50% reduction in forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) after operation, and there was no observed effect on the stress response as measured by plasma glucose and cortisol. It is concluded that while both techniques provide good analgesia, the degree and extent of nerve blockade are not sufficient to affect the afferent neurogenic stimuli responsible for the observed effects on pulmonary function and the stress response.