Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Oct 1988
Comparative StudyPrimary evaluation of the local anaesthetic properties of the amino amide agent ropivacaine (LEA 103).
The local anaesthestic properties of 1-propyl-2',6'-pipecoloxylidide, a congener of mepivacaine and bupivacaine, and its enantiomers were compared in animals. The (S)-enantiomer (ropivacaine, LEA 103) produced a longer duration of sciatic nerve block and infiltration anaesthesia than the racemate and the (R)-form. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine were equally potent in terms of block of evoked action potential in vitro and minimum effective concentration in vivo. ⋯ Ropivacaine was less toxic (i.v. and s.c. LD50-values) than bupivacaine but more toxic than lidocaine, and produced only weak local irritation. Due to a combination of interesting local anaesthetic properties and relative safety including cardiotoxic potential, we consider ropivacaine a candidate for further studies.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Oct 1988
Letter Comparative StudyEpidural versus combined spinal epidural block for caesarean section.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe reduction of pain on injection of propofol: the effect of addition of lignocaine.
The effects of addition of 1 ml of lignocaine (10 mg) or isotonic saline to 19 ml of the emulsified preparation of propofol (Diprivan) were studied in a randomised, double-blind trial in 80 patients. The incidence and severity of pain on injection of propofol were significantly reduced by the addition of lignocaine (P less than 0.01).
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSubarachnoid versus epidural bupivacaine 0.5% for caesarean section.
In order to compare subarachnoid (spinal) and epidural block for caesarean section, 40 women were randomly allocated to spinal or epidural analgesia with bupivacaine. The median dose of bupivacaine was 13 mg in the spinal group versus 155 mg in the epidural group. The mean time from induction to delivery was 32 min shorter in the spinal group (P less than 0.001). ⋯ Postoperatively, epidural block provided better pain relief. The patients in the epidural group had a lower pain score during the first 4 h after the operation (P less than 0.01). In spite of similar haemodynamic changes in the two groups, the mean base deficit in umbilical cord blood at delivery was higher in the spinal group (P less than 0.05).
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialDouble-blind comparison of transdermal scopolamine, droperidol and placebo against postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Since transdermal scopolamine (TS) seems effective against seasickness, we compared its antiemetic effect with intravenous droperidol (DHBP), our routine antidote for postoperative emesis. Ninety-six female patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for short-stay surgery were randomly allocated to three study groups after giving their informed consent. The three groups were as follows: TS adhesive, delivering 140 micrograms initially and 5 micrograms/h thereafter + placebo 0.5 ml i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo adhesive preoperatively + DHBP 0.5 ml (1.25 mg) i.v. 5 min before the end of surgery; transdermal placebo + 0.5 ml placebo i.v. as indicated above. ⋯ However, actual vomiting on the ward did not differ between the groups. Visual disturbances were more frequent after TS (P less than 0.01). We conclude that prophylactic transdermal scopolamine does not diminish postoperative emetic sequelae.