Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
-
J Magn Reson Imaging · Sep 2004
Comparative StudyThree-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging technique for myocardial-delayed hyperenhancement: a comparison with the two-dimensional technique.
To compare two-dimensional and three-dimensional techniques in the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) and in the grading transmural extent (TE). ⋯ Mean CNR, SNR, and SIR are significantly increased in the three-dimensional technique compared to the conventional two-dimensional technique.
-
To measure contact area of cartilage in the patellofemoral joint during weight bearing using an open MRI scanner. ⋯ Using an open magnet and specially designed apparatus, it is possible to image the patellar cartilage during physiologic loading. Knowledge of patellar cartilage contact area is needed to assess patellofemoral stress, which may be increased in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
-
J Magn Reson Imaging · Sep 2004
Comparative StudyFree-breathing, three-dimensional coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of sequences.
To compare six free-breathing, three-dimensional, magnetization-prepared coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequences. ⋯ Overall, Cartesian SSFP provided the best image quality with excellent vessel sharpness, visualization of long vessel segments, and good SNR and CNR.
-
J Magn Reson Imaging · Sep 2004
Comparative StudyParallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: comparison of image quality and artifacts.
To compare image quality, artifacts, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in cardiac cine TrueFISP magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without parallel acquisition techniques (PAT). ⋯ Time savings in PAT are accompanied by artifacts and an increase in image noise. The GRAPPA algorithm was superior to mSENSE concerning image quality, noise, and SNR.
-
J Magn Reson Imaging · Sep 2004
Comparative StudyComparison of matched-filtered two-dimensional projection and elliptical centric-ordered three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
To compare the image quality of matched-filtered two-dimensional projection magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and elliptical centric-ordered (EC) three-dimensional MRA. ⋯ Matched-filtered two-dimensional projection MRA provides comparable image quality and is a flexible alternative to EC three-dimensional MRA in applications where contrast timing is difficult and temporal information is of interest.