Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Apr 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparative evaluation of intrapleural and thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
To compare the efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and intrapleural analgesia (IPA) after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery with regard to quality of analgesia and complications. ⋯ IPA is a safe and effective technique for postoperative analgesia after MIDCAB surgery and has a low complication rate compared with TEA. Careful positioning, chest tube clamping, and anchoring of the catheter are mandatory for IPA to be effective.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Apr 1998
ReviewResolved: A pulmonary artery catheter should be used in the management of the critically ill patient. Pro.
Selected studies showing both positive and negative outcomes with the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) are reviewed. Indications for use of a PAC are controversial, although clearly the "red cap syndrome" is an indication for its insertion. There are sufficient data as well as personal experience to suggest that PACs do make a difference in the management of critically ill patients. ⋯ Studies are reviewed that addressed physician level of expertise related to PAC insertion, complications, data and waveform interpretation, and management. User knowledge clearly is suboptimal. Before attempting to draw conclusions from outcome studies, criteria for appropriate use need to be developed and clinician knowledge needs to be significantly improved.