Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Feb 1993
Effects of dexmedetomidine on systemic and coronary hemodynamics in the anesthetized dog.
In addition to central effects, which are the basis of their use in anesthesiology, alpha 2-adrenergic agonists have direct peripheral cardiovascular effects. Dexmedetomidine (DM) has been found to depress cardiac function in dogs, even after autonomic denervation. The present experiments evaluated the effects of DM on coronary flow, myocardial oxygen extraction, and cardiac function in intact, open chest dogs under enflurane anesthesia. ⋯ DM caused immediate dose-dependent increases in SVRI, CVR, LVEDP, C(a-v)O2, and C(a-cs)O2, and decreases in HR, and CI, with recovery between doses. DP/dtmax declined after the first two doses and stabilized thereafter, as plasma CA fell to minimal levels. Atipamezole completely reversed all changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Feb 1993
Effects of fentanyl on coronary blood flow distribution and myocardial oxygen consumption in the dog.
Little data exist on the effects of fentanyl on coronary blood flow (CBF), myocardial oxygen balance, and the regional distribution of blood flow. These studies were designed to determine whether fentanyl had any intrinsic effects on myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) and blood flow distribution. In anesthetized dogs, fentanyl was administered in a dose of 50 micrograms/kg and various measurements were made at 5 and 20 minutes. ⋯ MVO2 was essentially unchanged after atropine. Regional CBF (measured by radiolabelled microspheres) was unchanged at 5 minutes, but all layers exhibited significant reductions at 20 minutes. In the atropine group, only the LV epicardial area appeared to show decreases in flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Dec 1992
Continuous intra-arterial oximetry, pulse oximetry, and co-oximetry during cardiac surgery.
This study evaluated arterial catheter oximetry versus pulse oximetry in eight patients (ASA III-IV) who underwent cardiac surgery. Co-oximeter saturation values served as the standard. Arterial oxygen saturation was determined simultaneously with these three methods at 162 prospectively defined points of measurement before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). ⋯ The standard deviations of the individual differences between readings of catheter or pulse oximetry and readings of co-oximetry (= precision) were +/- 0.5% to +/- 1.0% for catheter oximetry and +/- 1.0% to +/- 1.2% for pulse oximetry. In summary, catheter oximetry was superior to pulse oximetry with regard to obtaining readings and to reliability of the obtained readings. Invasiveness and high costs influence the decision as to whether to use catheter oximetry, but if reliable and precise measurements of saturation are important at any time during surgery, pulse oximetry is an insufficient method and co-oximetry is a time-consuming method of analysis, whereas catheter oximetry is quick, reliable, and precise.