International journal of obstetric anesthesia
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAnalgesia after caesarean section: patient-controlled intravenous morphine vs epidural morphine.
In a randomized, double-blind study, conducted in 60 patients after caesarean section, we compared epidural morphine (5 mg) with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Efficacy of pain relief (visual analogue scale), comfort, satisfaction and side-effects were studied. In the PCA group, pain scores were higher (P < 0.005) from the third hour onward. ⋯ Consumption of morphine was higher in the PCA group. We conclude that epidural morphine analgesia, though of good quality, was associated with more pruritus. Morphine PCA, although producing a lesser degree of analgesia compared to epidural morphine, gave good satisfaction.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA comparison of catheter vs needle injection of local anesthetic for induction of epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.
It is generally believed that bolus injections of local anesthetic through an epidural needle produce a more rapid onset of blockade, but at the expense of an increased incidence and severity of hypotension, whereas intermittent injections through a catheter take longer to achieve adequate anesthesia but with a lower risk of hypotension. The present study investigated two commonly used needle and catheter epidural injection techniques for differences in speed of onset of surgical anesthesia and incidence and severity of hypotension. ⋯ No significant difference was found for the time to onset of surgical anesthesia. In the absence of benefits of needle injection, incremental catheter administration of local anesthetic with its multiple safety advantages is the technique of choice for induction of epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.
-
We wished to determine whether immunosuppression and/or acceleration of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated disease is related to the mode of anesthesia in the HIV infected parturient. Ninety-six known HIV-infected asymptomatic parturients who delivered between January 1990 and January 1992 at Grady Memorial Hospital were reviewed for pre-delivery health status, mode of anesthesia and peripartum/post-partum complications. Statistics used chi2 analysis. ⋯ Thirty-one of the 96 women had CD4/CD8 T-cell lymphocyte data at second trimester and 24-48 h post partum which showed no worsening of maternal immune status in women receiving regional anesthesia, local anesthesia/intravenous sedation or no anesthesia. We believe that both regional and general anesthesia can be performed safely on the asymptomatic HIV-infected parturient. The choice of anesthesia should be based on the usual obstetric and clinical considerations.