International journal of obstetric anesthesia
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Feb 2014
The 2013 Gerard W. Ostheimer Lecture: What's New in Obstetric Anesthesia?
The "What's New in Obstetric Anesthesia?" lecture is delivered annually in honor of the eminent obstetric anesthesiologist Gerard. W. Ostheimer. ⋯ The review is a redacted version of the lecture delivered at the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology's Annual Meeting in April 2013. Special emphasis is placed on non-invasive technologies and biomarkers that have the potential to improve clinical care of the pregnant woman. Furthermore, sufficient attention is focused on medical diseases that have their onset or are worsened during pregnancy.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Feb 2014
Letter Observational StudyQT interval prolongation following carbetocin in prevention of post-cesarean delivery hemorrhage.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Feb 2014
Observational StudyMajor obstetric haemorrhage: monitoring with thromboelastography, laboratory analyses or both?
Haemorrhage is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the obstetric population. The aim of this study was to compare the use of thromboelastography and laboratory analyses to evaluate haemostasis during major obstetric haemorrhage. A secondary aim was to evaluate correlations between the results of thromboelastography, laboratory analyses and estimated blood loss. ⋯ Impaired haemostasis, demonstrated by thromboelastography and laboratory analyses, was found after an estimated blood loss of 2000 mL. Thromboelastography provides faster results than standard laboratory testing which is advantageous in the setting of on-going obstetric haemorrhage. However, laboratory analyses found greater differences in coagulation variables, which correlated better with estimated blood loss.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Feb 2014
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyA randomized comparison of onset of anesthesia between spinal bupivacaine 5mg with immediate epidural 2% lidocaine 5mL and bupivacaine 10mg for cesarean delivery.
Previous studies using low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery have focused on hypotension and efficacy. This study evaluated whether, using a combined spinal-epidural technique, there was a difference in onset of anesthesia for cesarean delivery between low-dose spinal with an immediate epidural local anesthetic bolus, and conventional-dose spinal anesthesia. ⋯ Intrathecal bupivacaine 5 mg with immediate 2% epidural lidocaine 5 mL provided comparable onset and efficacy of anesthesia as bupivacaine 10 mg with immediate epidural normal saline 5 mL for cesarean delivery.