International journal of obstetric anesthesia
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 1992
The effectiveness of low dose droperidol in controlling nausea and vomiting during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.
The antiemetic efficacy of 0.5 mg of droperidol was evaluated in 128 term parturients undergoing elective and non-urgent cesarean section with epidural anesthesia. Following delivery, parturients received intravenously either 0.5 mg of droperidol or normal saline in a double-blinded fashion. Droperidol decreased nausea after delivery from 41 to 13% (P=0.001). ⋯ Analysis of the data using logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (P = 0.002), hypotension after delivery (P = 0.040), and vomiting prior to delivery (P = 0.017) were associated with increased nausea after delivery. No extrapyramidal symptoms or significant changes in pulse rate or blood pressure were associated with droperidol administration. We conclude that 0.5 mg of intravenous droperidol decreases nausea in term parturients undergoing non-urgent cesarean section with epidural anesthesia without producing unwanted side-effects.
-
The effectiveness of postoperative pain relief and the frequency of side effects with three different doses of epidural diamorphine (2.0, 3.5 and 5 mg) was investigated. The study was carried out double-blind in 30 women undergoing awake elective caesarean section. Postoperative pain intensity was measured on a linear analogue scale. ⋯ Three patients in the 2 mg group failed to achieve scores of zero but were comfortable. No nausea or vomiting was seen but the incidence of itching was 0, 30% and 80% in the 2.0, 3.5 and 5 mg groups respectively. We conclude that epidural diamorphine 2 mg is adequate for relief of post-caesarean pain and higher doses may increase the incidence of unwanted side-effects.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 1992
Epidural insertion: how far should the epidural needle be inserted before testing for loss of resistance?
The aim of this study was to determine the depth to which an epidural needle can safely be inserted before testing for loss of resistance. This ensures that the epidural needle is advanced far enough to encounter ligament thus avoiding the confusion that can occur when testing for loss of resistance whilst still in subcutaneous tissues. A survey of the distance between the skin and the epidural space in 400 obstetric patients was performed. ⋯ Dividing the patient's pregnant weight by 25 will give this distance in centimetres. Seventy six paramedian approaches were performed and a less good correlation was found between the depth of the space and the woman's weight. There was no correlation with height or foot size.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Sep 1991
A comparison of epidural diamorphine with intramuscular papaveretum following caesarean section.
Following caesarean section carried out under epidural blockade using local anaesthetic only, 40 consenting women were randomly allocated to receive either epidural diamorphine 2.5-5 mg in 10 ml physiological saline and intramuscular saline or epidural saline and intramuscular papaveretum 10-20 mg, dosage depending on weight, when the pain returned. When analgesia was next requested the alternative treatment was given. A visual analogue pain score was recorded before and 15, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min after the first treatment. ⋯ No difference in respiratory rate was noted but side-effects were more frequent with epidural diamorphine. Despite this more women preferred this treatment. Because of enhanced mobility provided by good analgesia epidural diamorphine is worth offering to women following caesarean section.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Sep 1991
The effects of ephedrine and etilefrine on uterine and fetal blood flow and on fetal myocardial function during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
The effects of two vasopressors, ephedrine and etilefrine, on blood flow in maternal uterine, fetal umbilical, middle cerebral and renal arteries and on fetal myocardial function were studied by colour Doppler and M-mode echocardiography techniques during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. There were 7 healthy pregnant women in each treatment group. The vascular resistance of maternal uterine arteries increased significantly after both of the vasopressors while the vascular resistance of the umbilical artery remained unchanged. ⋯ Etilefrine caused no detectable changes in fetal haemodynamics or in fetal myocardial function. These findings demonstrate that vasopressors administered for the treatment of minor maternal arterial pressure fall produce vasoconstriction in the uterine circulation during spinal anaesthesia, yet healthy fetuses seem to tolerate these haemodynamic alterations well. On the other hand, ephedrine caused changes in fetal myocardial function and in the vascular resistance of fetal middle cerebral and renal arteries, which demonstrates the potential modifying effect of vasoactive drug given to the mother on fetal haemodynamics.