American heart journal
-
American heart journal · Oct 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative StudyDual antiplatelet therapy versus oral anticoagulation plus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and low-to-moderate thromboembolic risk undergoing coronary stenting: design of the MUSICA-2 randomized trial.
Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the recommended therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) because it reduces the risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting (PCI-S). In patients with AF requiring PCI-S, the association of DAPT and OAC carries an increased risk of bleeding, whereas OAC therapy or DAPT alone may not protect against the risk of developing new ischemic or thromboembolic events. ⋯ The MUSICA-2 will attempt to determine the most effective and safe treatment in patients with nonvalvular AF and CHADS2 score ≤2 after PCI-S. Restricting TT for AF patients at high risk for stroke may reduce the incidence of bleeding without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications.
-
American heart journal · Oct 2013
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyPrognostic significance of presenting blood pressure in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in relation to prior history of hypertension.
Hypertension is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, whereas low systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a powerful adverse prognosticator in acute coronary syndrome. However, it is unclear whether the prognostic significance of low SBP differs in patients with versus without prior history of hypertension. We sought to investigate the relationships between presenting SBP, prior hypertension, antihypertensive medication use, and outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). ⋯ Low SBP on presentation, but not prior hypertension, was independently associated with in-hospital mortality in NSTEACS. The powerful prognostic value of SBP is similar regardless of a history of hypertension or pre-admission antihypertensive medication use.
-
American heart journal · Oct 2013
Comparative StudyAtrial fibrillation in myocardial infarction patients: Impact on health care utilization.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) often complicates myocardial infarction (MI). While AF adversely impacts survival in MI patients, the impact of AF on health care utilization has not been studied. ⋯ In MI patients, the risk of hospitalizations, ED visits, and outpatient visits differed by the timing of AF onset, with the greatest risk conferred by late-onset AF. Atrial fibrillation imparts an adverse prognosis after MI, underscoring the importance of its management in MI patients.
-
American heart journal · Oct 2013
Review Meta AnalysisNon-infarct-related artery revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease, guidelines recommend infarct-related artery (IRA) only intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) except in patients with hemodynamic instability. To assess the available evidence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of non-IRA PCI as an adjunct to primary PCI (same sitting PCI [SS-PCI]) with IRA only PCI (IRA-PCI) in the setting of STEMI. ⋯ There is paucity of randomized data to guide management of STEMI patients with multivessel disease. SS-PCI group in cohort studies has higher baseline risk compared to IRA-PCI. The primary end point is higher for SS-PCI in observational cohort studies but this difference did not persist after exclusion of shock patients and for analysis limited to randomized controlled trials. These findings underscore the need of a large randomized controlled trial to guide therapy for a commonly encountered clinical situation.
-
American heart journal · Sep 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative StudyApixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation according to prior warfarin use: results from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation trial.
Patients with atrial fibrillation who are vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-naive may have a higher risk of thrombosis and/or bleeding than VKA-experienced patients. ⋯ The treatment effects of apixaban (vs warfarin) were not modified by VKA naivety. The rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were numerically lower among the patients assigned to apixaban, irrespective of prior VKA use.