Internal medicine
-
We herein report a 26-year-old man diagnosed with Wilson's disease (WD), initially treated for schizophrenia for 11 years. At 26 years old, he was admitted because of status epilepticus. ⋯ Psychotic symptoms in WD can precede neurological manifestations, and extrapyramidal signs may be mistaken for drug-induced Parkinsonism. WD should be considered in patients presenting with progressive Parkinsonism preceded by schizophrenia-like psychiatric symptoms.
-
Background Despite the controversy regarding its clinical utility, the PaO2/FIO2 ratio has been used to define the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) details summary estimates of the predictive performance of PaO2/FIO2 ratio in predicting mortality in patients with ARDS. Methods To clarify the integrated diagnostic accuracy, we included studies in which the study population comprised patients with ARDS in any clinical setting, included adult patients (≥18 years old), and evaluated mortality. ⋯ Overall, the risk of bias is high. For PaO2/FIO2 of 100 and 200 the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC were 44.8% (95% CI, 38.1%-51.7%), 70.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-74.9%), 0.60 (0.58-0.64) and 83.9% (95% CI, 78.9%-87.8%), 26.1% (95% CI, 20.8%-32.1%), 0.64 (0.60-0.69), respectively. Conclusion The PaO2/FIO2 ratio alone did not have impressive prediction accuracy for mortality in patients with ARDS and might not be able to be used solely as a clinical prognostic tool.
-
Objective Early defibrillation is crucial for improving the survival rates of patients with shockable cardiac arrest (OHCA). Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are essential in basic life support (BLS), yet their usage in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests remains around 10%. There are two types of AEDs: semi-automatic (s-AED) and fully automatic (f-AED), with the latter automatically delivering a shock if indicated. ⋯ Although a subset of participants expressed hesitation in pressing the shock button on the s-AEDs, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Conclusion This study suggests that preferences for AED types may vary between medical and non-medical professional groups, with some reluctance in using s-AEDs. Although no significant differences in hesitation were found between the groups, f-AEDs may reduce hesitation and potentially improve AED effectiveness during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.