American journal of surgery
-
Recent studies have shown that selective gut decontamination can reduce the incidence of pneumonia, but this does not decrease multiple organ failure (MOF) or mortality. These findings have prompted the hypothesis that pneumonia is an inconsequential symptom of MOF. To test this, we prospectively evaluated 123 high-risk trauma patients (mean Injury Severity Score = 36.2 +/- 1.5). ⋯ Of note, 10 (71%) of these patients died. Among the remaining 14 patients with MOF, 10 developed pneumonia, but this was associated with a minimal increase (less than or equal to 2) in MOF scoring (3 patients died). These data, by temporal association with MOF scoring, implicate pneumonia in precipitating or significantly worsening organ failure in 50% of the patients who developed MOF.
-
Clinical Trial
Preliminary report on videothoracoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of thoracic injury.
A prospective trial of videothoracoscopy was conducted at an urban trauma center between February 1992 and February 1993 to determine the efficiency of this less invasive method of evaluation and treatment. Twenty-four consecutive patients with chest trauma (penetrating, n = 22; blunt, n = 2) were examined thoracoscopically for clotted hemothorax that otherwise would have been treated with thoracotomy (n = 9), suspected diaphragmatic injury (n = 10), and continued bleeding (n = 5). To ensure maximal exposure, general anesthesia with a double-lumen endotracheal tube was used in each patient. ⋯ Intercostal artery injury was confirmed in all patients, and diathermy provided hemostasis in three patients without thoracotomy. No complications occurred. These data suggest the following: (1) Videothoracoscopy is an accurate, safe, and minimally invasive method for the assessment of diaphragmatic injuries, control of continued chest wall bleeding, and early evacuation of clotted hemothorax. (2) This technique should be used more frequently in patients with thoracic trauma. (3) Technical advances may expand the therapeutic role of thoracoscopy.
-
The year 1992 marked the 50th anniversary of one of the worst civilian disasters in American history. On November 28, 1942, fire destroyed Boston's Cocoanut Grove nightclub, killing 491 people and sending hundreds more to area hospitals. ⋯ In addition, the fire stimulated organization of burn care facilities, public safety legislation, and burn prevention. The history of the fire is reviewed, emphasizing its role in stimulating advances that formed some of the foundations of modern burn treatment.
-
A large experience with patients who had radical neck dissection for oral squamous carcinoma has been reviewed in order to compare elective lymphadenectomy results with those achieved when neck dissection was delayed until metastases appeared or was performed initially for limited N1 neck disease. No significant difference in survival rates was observed, but neck failure was a more significant problem when treatment was delayed. This was most obvious in patients treated for tongue cancer. Although the impact of elective neck treatment on "cure" rates will require prospective studies, it seems clear that elective lymphadenectomy can enhance regional control of cancer and improve the quality of the patients' survival.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of APACHE II, Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score as predictors of outcome in critically injured trauma patients.
Trauma Score (TS), APACHE II score, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) have been utilized to quantitate severity of illness in various groups of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the relationship of the APACHE II score, TS, and "computer-derived" ISS with outcome in critically injured trauma patients. Data were recorded prospectively in a computer database for 428 consecutive trauma admissions. ⋯ APACHE II score was the best predictor of both ICU and hospital outcome in these critically ill trauma patients. However, when combining all three measures (APACHE II score, TS, and ISS), only a portion of the variance in outcome is explained by the scores (R2 < 0.05). We conclude that scoring systems for outcome prediction should be utilized only as an adjunct to clinical assessment in the evaluation of the severity of illness and mortality risk in critically ill trauma patients.