American journal of surgery
-
Clinical Trial
Oral contrast is not necessary in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma by computed tomography.
The administration of oral contrast (OC) is widely recommended for computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen in patients with blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether routine abdominal CT scans performed without OC were associated with diagnostic error in patients with blunt trauma. Four hundred ninety-two patients were identified from our Trauma Registry who had CT scans for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma between January 1988 and December 1991. ⋯ There were 5 bowel injuries among the 42 patients who underwent an abdominal operation; in none would the use of OC have ensured the preoperative diagnosis. We found that the omission of OC did not represent a disadvantage to patients with blunt trauma undergoing a routine abdominal CT scan. Potential time delays and the hazards associated with the use of OC were minimized.
-
Inhalation injury predisposes burn patients to pneumonia, respiratory failure, and death, but the incidence and consequences of respiratory failure in the absence of inhalation injury are not well known. In a review of 529 burn patients admitted over a 4-year period, patients with inhalation injury had a 73% incidence of respiratory failure (hypoxemia, multiple pulmonary infections, or prolonged ventilator support) and a 20% incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In patients without inhalation injury, respiratory failure developed in 5% of patients and ARDS in 2% (both p < 0.001). ⋯ All patients who died had multiple organ failure. This review demonstrates that respiratory failure, regardless of its cause, frequently leads to multiple organ failure and death. Inhalation injury, in the absence of respiratory failure, does not appear to contribute to mortality.
-
Clinical Trial
Preliminary report on videothoracoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of thoracic injury.
A prospective trial of videothoracoscopy was conducted at an urban trauma center between February 1992 and February 1993 to determine the efficiency of this less invasive method of evaluation and treatment. Twenty-four consecutive patients with chest trauma (penetrating, n = 22; blunt, n = 2) were examined thoracoscopically for clotted hemothorax that otherwise would have been treated with thoracotomy (n = 9), suspected diaphragmatic injury (n = 10), and continued bleeding (n = 5). To ensure maximal exposure, general anesthesia with a double-lumen endotracheal tube was used in each patient. ⋯ Intercostal artery injury was confirmed in all patients, and diathermy provided hemostasis in three patients without thoracotomy. No complications occurred. These data suggest the following: (1) Videothoracoscopy is an accurate, safe, and minimally invasive method for the assessment of diaphragmatic injuries, control of continued chest wall bleeding, and early evacuation of clotted hemothorax. (2) This technique should be used more frequently in patients with thoracic trauma. (3) Technical advances may expand the therapeutic role of thoracoscopy.
-
A large experience with patients who had radical neck dissection for oral squamous carcinoma has been reviewed in order to compare elective lymphadenectomy results with those achieved when neck dissection was delayed until metastases appeared or was performed initially for limited N1 neck disease. No significant difference in survival rates was observed, but neck failure was a more significant problem when treatment was delayed. This was most obvious in patients treated for tongue cancer. Although the impact of elective neck treatment on "cure" rates will require prospective studies, it seems clear that elective lymphadenectomy can enhance regional control of cancer and improve the quality of the patients' survival.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of APACHE II, Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score as predictors of outcome in critically injured trauma patients.
Trauma Score (TS), APACHE II score, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) have been utilized to quantitate severity of illness in various groups of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the relationship of the APACHE II score, TS, and "computer-derived" ISS with outcome in critically injured trauma patients. Data were recorded prospectively in a computer database for 428 consecutive trauma admissions. ⋯ APACHE II score was the best predictor of both ICU and hospital outcome in these critically ill trauma patients. However, when combining all three measures (APACHE II score, TS, and ISS), only a portion of the variance in outcome is explained by the scores (R2 < 0.05). We conclude that scoring systems for outcome prediction should be utilized only as an adjunct to clinical assessment in the evaluation of the severity of illness and mortality risk in critically ill trauma patients.