European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
The coincidental development of minimal intervention techniques for carrying out anterior lumbar spinal fusion and the introduction of cages to provide mechanical support of introduced bone graft led to the development of a type of cage suitable for both minimal intervention use (laparoscopic) and for the standard open procedure (the BAK cage). Reported results concentrated in the main on feasibility, safety and fusion rate achieved, rather than clinical outcome. ⋯ There was no long-term benefit from the laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic insertion at the L4/5 level was attended by a greater incidence of complications, and had a longer learning curve.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Posterior endoscopic discectomy (and other procedures).
Percutaneous approaches to lumbar discectomy were somewhat controversial, because of their limited indications. They have not proven to be as effective as standard open lumbar disc surgery, because of longer operating times and some technical problems in addressing all the different aspects of lumbar disc herniations. ⋯ MED, and METR'x which evolved from it,. allow the surgeon to address not only contained lumbar disc herniations, but also free-fragment disc pathology and symptomatic lateral recess stenosis secondary to bony hypertrophy. The surgical technique is summarized and some preliminary clinical results of a prospective multicenter study with 13 months' mean follow-up are presented.
-
Endoscopic surgery of the thoracic spine has up to now been considered as an experimental procedure. Reports published in recent years have shown that the results achieved with this technique are as good as, or for some indications superior to, those reported for classic open approaches. A review of the indications, limitations, advantages and disadvantages is presented. Although there is still resistance to acknowledging the effectiveness of this procedure, experience has shown that the results are as good, complications are fewer and postoperative recovery is improved, thus shortening the total hospitalization time.
-
Interbody cages in the lumbar spine have met with mixed success in clinical studies. This has led many investigators to supplement cages with posterior instrumentation. The objective of this literature review is to address the mechanics of interbody cage fixation in the lumbar spine with respect to three-dimensional stabilization and the strength of the cage-vertebra interface. ⋯ The axial compressive strength of this interface is highly dependent upon vertebral body bone density. Other factors such as preservation of the subchondral bony end-plate and cage design are clearly less important in the compressive strength. Supplementary posterior instrumentation does not enhance substantially the interface strength in axial compression.