European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Comparative Study
CT scans versus conventional tomography in acute fractures of the odontoid process.
Four different radiological diagnostic methods were compared as to their diagnostic relevance in the analysis of odontoid fractures. Thirty-one patients with fresh odontoid fractures were investigated using standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, conventional tomography, axial computerized tomography and two-dimensional reconstruction in the sagittal and the coronal planes. As a control, 13 patients without odontoid fractures were examined. ⋯ The coefficients of correlation for the conventional tomography and two-dimensional reconstruction were kappa=0.774 and kappa=0.907, respectively. For conventional radiography and axial computerized tomography (CT), the coefficients were clearly lower, at kappa=0.364 and kappa=0.627, respectively. The less time-consuming CT examination with sagittal and coronal reconstructions is equivalent with respect to diagnostic accuracy and can, therefore, replace conventional tomography in the evaluation fractures.
-
Case Reports Comparative Study
Finite element model of the Jefferson fracture: comparison with a cadaver model.
This study tries to explain the reason why the Jefferson fracture is a burst fracture, using two different biomechanical models: a finite element model (FEM) and a cadaver model used to determine strain distribution in C1 during axial static compressive loading. For the FEM model, a three-dimensional model of C1 was obtained from a 29-year-old healthy human, using axial CT scans with intervals of 1.0 mm. The mesh model was composed of 8200 four-noded isoparametric tetrahedrons and 37,400 solid elements. ⋯ The strain values obtained from the two experimental models showed similar trends. The FEM analysis revealed that maximum strain changes occurred where the maximum shear and von Mises stresses were concentrated. The changes in the C1 strain and stress values during static axial loading biomechanically prove that the Jefferson fracture is a burst fracture.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The General Function Score: a useful tool for measurement of physical disability. Validity and reliability.
The General Function Score (GFS) is a disease-specific instrument consisting of nine items focusing on strict physical activities of daily living. It is intended as an alternative to the more complex scores of disability (such as the Oswestry Disability Index), serving as a complement to the quality of life instruments in the study of low back pain (LBP). It was developed from an original 17-item questionnaire, of which 11 of the items were tested for criterion validity in an observer-supervised performance test. ⋯ The GFS showed a high responsiveness to difference and change. The effect size was 0.82-0.96 in surgically treated disc herniation and 0.55-0.85 in spondylolisthesis. The GFS is a highly valid and reliable instrument with good responsiveness and feasibility, useful for evaluation of physical disability.
-
This review presents the history of chemonucleolysis, the techniques, indications, contraindications, and complications. Presenting an historical overview and comparison of success rates with surgical discectomy may provide a fresh understanding of the controversy surrounding chemonucleolysis and establish its efficacy in relation to more invasive treatments. ⋯ In the experience and opinion of the authors, chemonucleolysis remains a viable alternative for patients who have exhausted all conservative means of treatment. Proper patient selection leads to success rates comparable to open discectomy and microdiscectomy.
-
The Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) measures general health and well-being. Within the last 5 years it has been used increasingly to characterise patients in the medical literature. Relatively few studies have used the SF-36 on patients with chronic low back pain undergoing preoperative evaluation, but results suggest that it may be predictive of surgical outcome. ⋯ The odds ratio (OR) of receiving a nonorganic pain drawing was 22 (95% confidence interval, or CI, 7-65) if the scores on RE and MH were more than 2 standard deviations (SD) below the Danish norm. This is the first study providing evidence that pain drawing ratings are influenced by the psychological scales of the SF-36. The clinical relevance of this observation regarding prediction of outcome after spinal surgery should be assessed in future studies.