European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Genetic diagnosis is a promising approach because several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) progression have been reported. We review the predictive value of SNPs in curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. ⋯ Many promising SNPs have been identified to predict the curve progression of AIS. However, conflicting results from replication studies and different ethnic groups hamper their reliability. Convincing SNPs from multiethnic populations and functional verification are needed.
-
The Osteoporotic Fracture Working Group (Spine Division of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society) has developed a classification system for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures, namely the osteoporotic fracture (OF) classification system. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intraobserver reliabilities of the OF classification system for osteoporotic vertebral body fractures (VFs) at a level-one trauma centre. ⋯ The OF classification system is easy to use. It shows good interobserver reliability and substantial intraobserver reliability if diagnostic prerequisites (conventional radiography, MRI, and CT scans) are met.
-
Circumferential (AP) lumbar fusion surgery is an effective treatment for degenerative and deformity conditions of the spine. The lateral decubitus position allows for simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior aspects of the spine, enabling instrumentation of both columns without the need for patient repositioning. This paper seeks to outline the anatomical and patient-related considerations in anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine from L1-S1 in the lateral decubitus position. ⋯ A development of a framework to analyze these factors will result in improved patient outcomes and a reduction in complications for lateral ALIF, transpsoas, and anterior-to-psoas surgeries.
-
To describe a comprehensive setting of the different alternatives for performing a single position fusion surgery based on the opinion of leading surgeons in the field. ⋯ A recommendation of the setting for performing single position fusion surgery procedure (LSPS, LA and PLS) was developed based on a survey of leaders in the field.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Ceramic bone graft substitute vs autograft in XLIF: a prospective randomized single-center evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
The objective of this prospective, parallel, randomized, single-center study is to evaluate the clinical success of a commercial ceramic bone graft substitute (CBGS) for autograft in eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) procedures. Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name). Author 1 Given name: [Cristiano Magalhães], Last name [Menezes]. Author 2 Given name: [Gabriel Carvalho], Last name [Lacerda]. Author 5 Given name: [Erica Godinho], Last name [Menezes]. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.yes METHODS: Forty-five adult subjects were consecutively enrolled and randomized into a single-level XLIF procedure using either CBGS or iliac crest bone graft autograft (30 and 15 subjects, respectively). The primary outcome was fusion rate at 12, 18, and 24 months. Secondary outcomes were pain and disability measured by HRQOL questionnaires. Kindly check and confirm whether the corresponding author and his corresponding affiliations is correctly identified.yes RESULTS: The fusion rates for both CBGS and autograft groups at the 24-month follow-up were 96.4% and 100%, respectively. For the CBGS group, mean ODI, mean back pain, and mean worst leg pain significantly improved at the 24-month follow-up by 76.7% (39.9-9.3), 77.6% (7.3-1.6), and 81.3% (5.1-1.0), respectively. For the autograft group, mean ODI, mean back pain, and mean worst leg pain significantly improved during the same time period by 77.1% (35.9-8.2), 75.6% (6.1-1.5), and 86.0% (6.6-0.9), respectively (all time points between groups, p < 0.05). ⋯ The results of this prospective, randomized study support the use of CBGS as a standalone bone graft substitute for autograft in single-level XLIF surgery. The clinical performance and safety outcomes reported here are consistent with published evidence on CBGS. Improvements in patient-reported back pain, leg pain, and disability outcomes were comparable between the CBGS and autograft groups.