European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Disadvantages of thoracic posterior implants and developments in rod contouring in situ led to the design of a new spinal implant: the bipedicular spinal fixation device (BSF). The BSF is composed of two bifid hooks linked by a compression transverse connector and inserted into the costo-vertebral and costo-transverse joints. The aim of this biomechanical study was to determine the loading tolerance of the BSF. ⋯ The mean BMD estimated by DEXA was 0.557 g/cm(2). The BSF loading tolerance was compatible with the in situ rod contouring technique requirements when we considered posterior and lateral pull-out tests. The transversal compression test determined the appropriate and efficient BSF tightening force.
-
Pinealectomy frequently produces spinal deformity in some animal models, but the precise biological mechanism of this phenomenon remains obscure. The current study investigated the effects of an autograft pineal body on the development of spinal deformity and serum melatonin (MLT) concentration after pinealectomy in the chicken. Thirty-six chickens (2 days of age) were divided into three equal groups. ⋯ Interestingly, there were no significant differences in either serum MLT levels or development of scoliosis between groups B and C. From the results of the current study, it is evident that the intramuscular pineal gland transplantation following pinealectomy in young Hybro Broiler chickens has no significant effect on the development of spinal deformity and serum MLT level. In the light of this result, the role of MLT in the development of spinal deformity in chickens after pinealectomy remains controversial, and further investigations are warranted.
-
Comparative Study
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: does stable anterior fixation matter?
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior lumbar interbody fusion without instrumentation (uninstrumented ALIF) against that with stable anterior cage fixation using Hartshill horseshoe instrumentation (ALIF-HH) for similar severity of disc disease. Between April 1994 and June 1998 the senior author N. R. ⋯ On subjective score assessment, there was a satisfactory outcome (score0.05). On classification by the Oswestry Index into four categories, we found no difference in outcome between the two groups: 83.3% ( n=20) had a satisfactory outcome (defined as Excellent or Better) with ALIF and 77.8% ( n=21) had a satisfactory outcome with ALIF-HH using the Oswestry Disability Index for post-operative assessment ( P>0.05). The results of this study indicate that the Hartshill horseshoe cage does improve the fusion rate, but does not affect clinical outcome.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.
Pain drawings have been used in spine surgery for diagnostic use and psychological evaluation of fusion candidates; they have rarely been used to evaluate pain status after spinal fusion. This study is a 5-year follow-up on a randomised clinical trial assigning patients to posterolateral spinal fusion with or without pedicle screw instrumentation. Patients were mailed a pain drawing and questionnaires including questions regarding work, social status, smoking status, the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ), and the Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS). ⋯ Ten percent still experience donor site pain. In general, instrumentation does not affect the amount and localisation of pain 5 years after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. The pain drawing seems to be a valuable tool when following spinal fusion patients, but its use as prognostic marker in connection with fusion surgery needs further investigation.