European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of BMP-2 and combined IGF-I/TGF-ss1 application in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
Growth factors have proven to promote spine fusion. However, no comparative evaluation of growth factors in spinal fusion has yet been performed. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of combined IGF-I and TGF-ss1 application with BMP-2 application and autologous cancellous bone graft at an early time point in a sheep cervical spine fusion model. ⋯ In comparison to the autologous cancellous bone graft group, both growth factors (BMP-2 and combined IGF-I and TGF-ss1) significantly improved the biomechanical results of interbody fusion. No systemic side effects were observed for either growth factor. On the basis of these preliminary results, it would appear that combined IGF-I/TGF-ss1 application yields equivalent results to BMP-2 application at an early time point in anterior sheep cervical spine fusion.
-
New joint replacement registries are being widely implemented across national and international organizations. The need for a continuous long-term post-market surveillance of implants has been recognized, and has become increasingly important to ensure the quality of prosthetic components. Registry data with large case numbers represent an acceptable alternative to controlled randomized clinical trials, which are often difficult to conduct in orthopedic surgery. ⋯ Within Spine Tango, the major challenge in registry design and structure is the definition of and agreement upon a core set of questions as a common European dataset. Additional questions for national or individual interest can also be dynamically added to the core dataset. An automated implant tracking system has also been setup, which allows highly precise product documentation without additional work for clinical staff members.
-
Comparative Study
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.
Posterior correction and fusion with segmental hook instrumentation represent the gold standard in the surgical treatment of progressive idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. However, there is a debate over whether pedicle screws are safe in scoliosis surgery and whether their usage might enable a better curve correction and a shorter fusion length. The details of curve correction, fusion length and complication rate of 99 patients with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis treated with either hook or pedicle screw instrumentation were analyzed. ⋯ One pedicle screw at T5 was exchanged due to the direct proximity to the aorta. There were no neurologic complications related to pedicle screw instrumentation. Pedicle screw instrumentation alone or in combination with proximal hook instrumentation offers a significantly better primary and secondary curve correction in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis and enables a significantly shorter fusion length.