The American surgeon
-
The American surgeon · Oct 2011
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyAre all level I trauma centers created equal? A comparison of American College of Surgeons and state-verified centers.
Scant literature investigates potential outcome differences between Level I trauma centers. We compared overall survival and survival after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients admitted to American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified versus state-verified Level I trauma centers. Using the National Trauma Data Bank Version 7.0, incident codes associated with admission to an ACS-verified facility were extracted and compared with the group admitted to state-verified centers. ⋯ Level I verification does not necessarily imply similar outcomes in all subgroups. Federal oversight may become necessary to ensure uniformity of care, maximizing outcomes across all United States trauma systems. Further study is needed.
-
The American surgeon · Oct 2011
Comparative StudyAre high-dose perioperative steroids necessary in patients undergoing colorectal surgery treated with steroid therapy within the past 12 months?
Patients previously on corticosteroids within 1 year before surgery are routinely treated with perioperative high-dose corticosteroids. However, there is little evidence to support this practice. We postulated that patients off steroids but treated with corticosteroids within 1 year before surgery may be safely managed without perioperative steroids. ⋯ No patients required rescue high-dose steroids for adrenal insufficiency. In patients with IBD undergoing major colorectal surgery, treated with corticosteroids within the past year, management without perioperative steroids seems safe. A prospective study assessing perioperative corticosteroid dosing is in progress.
-
The American surgeon · Oct 2011
Comparative StudyMortality risk stratification in elderly trauma patients based on initial arterial lactate and base deficit levels.
Elderly trauma patients have worse outcomes than their younger counterparts. Early risk stratification remains difficult, particularly because traditional vital signs are less reliable. We hypothesized that arrival lactate and base deficit (BD) could be used to predict mortality in elderly trauma patients with a normal admission blood pressure. ⋯ The OR for mortality was 5.2 (95% CI, 2.5 to 11.2; P < 0.0001) in patients with a BD -4 or less. Elevated lactate and BD were even stronger predictors of early mortality (within first 24 hours). After increasing the hypotension threshold to a systolic blood pressure 110 mmHg or greater, lactate and BD remained highly predictive of in-hospital and 24-hour mortality.
-
The American surgeon · Oct 2011
Comparative StudyDoes preoperative magnetic resonance imaging beneficially alter surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma?
The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer remains controversial. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative breast MRI on patients with biopsy-proven invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) initially deemed eligible for breast conserving therapy. We analyzed a prospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven ILC that consented to undergo preoperative diagnostic MRI at our institution. ⋯ MRI led to eight biopsies, for a pathologically confirmed true positive rate of 82 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI) 62-101%] and only two unnecessary biopsies. Preoperative MRI beneficially altered surgical management in 42 per cent of patients (95% CI 19-65%) without leading to unnecessary surgery, and only one patient required reexcision for positive margins (5.8%, CI -5.8-17.4%). In conclusion, preoperative MRI in patients with ILC can detect additional disease that was missed by conventional workup, allowing for better preoperative planning and more appropriate oncologic resection.
-
The American surgeon · Oct 2011
Comparative StudyPreoperative serum albumin but not prealbumin is an excellent predictor of postoperative complications and mortality in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
Preoperative serum albumin level is well recognized as a general predictor of adverse surgical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy. Whether serum albumin or prealbumin levels can better predict postoperative surgical complications and death remains unknown. A retrospective review of 641 consecutive patients operated nonemergently for GI malignancies between January 1, 1997, and July 31, 2008, disclosed that 104 patients (16.2%) had complications and 23 (3.6%) subsequently died. ⋯ In contrast, a prealbumin level below the discriminatory threshold of 18 mg/dL was a predictor of only overall morbidity (P = 0.014) and infectious complications (P = 0.024), but not of noninfectious complications or mortality (P = nonsignificant). We conclude that compared with the preoperative serum prealbumin level, the albumin level has superior predictive value for overall postoperative morbidity, both infectious and noninfectious complications, and mortality. The inclusion of serum prealbumin level in the routine preoperative testing of patients with GI malignancy for the purpose of predicting postoperative outcomes is neither clinically necessary nor cost-effective.