Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Nitrous oxide anaesthesia and vomiting. The effect of nitrous oxide anaesthesia on the incidence of vomiting following gynaecological laparoscopy.
Eighty-seven patients undergoing routine laparoscopy were divided randomly into two groups to study the effect of nitrous oxide anaesthesia on the incidence of postoperative vomiting. Patients in group A received nitrous oxide as part of their anaesthetic, while in group B nitrous oxide was omitted. Significantly fewer patients in group B vomited when compared with group A (17 percent and 49 percent respectively; p less than 0.005). We suggest that an anaesthetic technique which avoids nitrous oxide may be especially indicated in patients undergoing laparoscopy.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Triazolam premedication. A comparison with lorazepam and placebo in gynaecological patients.
A randomised, double blind study, of 58 female patients undergoing laparoscopic investigation was carried out to compare triazolam 0.25 mg, lorazepam 2 mg, or placebo as oral premedication. Each patient was assessed by only one of the authors both pre- and postoperatively with regard to anxiolysis, sedation and rapidity of recovery. Triazolam and lorazepam were each associated with a significant reduction in anxiety compared to the initial assessment, whereas placebo had no anxiolytic effect. ⋯ Two hours after the operation, the patients who had had triazolam or lorazepam were significantly more sleepy than those who received placebo. However, at 6 hours postoperatively there was no difference between triazolam and placebo, whilst those who had been given lorazepam were still significantly more sleepy than those given placebo. Triazolam appears to offer advantages over either lorazepam or placebo in patients who require rapid recovery, sedation and reduction in pre-operative anxiety.
-
The demands made upon the Bristol obstetric flying squad over the past 14 years have been analysed. During this period, the number of calls received per year has decreased dramatically. ⋯ Of importance to anaesthetists is the gross reduction in the number of cases where it is necessary to give anaesthesia 'in the field'. This may lead to complacency and lack of familiarity with the equipment carried by the flying squad.