Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide when included in a patient-controlled analgesia infusion.
A double-blind, randomised, controlled trial was performed to assess the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide when included in a morphine patient-controlled analgesia regimen. Fifty ASA grade 1 or 2 patients scheduled for elective intermediate or major gynaecological surgery were allocated into one of two groups. All patients received a standardised anaesthetic and metoclopramide 5 mg was given intravenously 10 min before the end of the procedure. ⋯ Pain scores, sedation scores, and morphine requirement were not significantly different between the groups. There was no difference in nausea scores between the groups, but more patients suffered moderate or severe nausea in group 1 (10 patients) than group 2 (three patients, p < 0.026). We conclude that metoclopramide, when included in a patient-controlled analgesia regimen, reduces the incidence of moderate to severe nausea, but not the overall incidence of nausea.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation: comparison of the Belscope and Macintosh blades.
This study was designed to compare the degree of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation using the Belscope and Macintosh laryngoscope blades. Twenty ASA 1 and 2 patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were studied. Following induction of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, a neutral cross-table lateral cervical spine X ray was taken. ⋯ Movement of the cervical spine was evaluated by tracing bony landmarks on each film and then superimposing the neutral and intubating films. We were unable to demonstrate a difference in the amount of cervical spine movement comparing the two blades. Using the Belscope blade, intubation took longer (median 18 s) than the Macintosh blade (median 12 s, p < 0.01) and was unsuccessful in two patients despite adequate visualisation of the vocal cords.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of Plasmalyte 148 and 0.9% saline for intra-operative fluid replacement.
Thirty patients undergoing major hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either 0.9% saline or Plasmalyte 148 (a balanced salt solution), at 15 ml.kg-1.h-1. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed before and after surgery. Plasma biochemistry (Na+, K+, Cl-, lactate) measurements were made before and after surgery and at 24 h after surgery. ⋯ The exclusive use of 0.9% saline intra-operatively can produce a temporary hyperchloraemic acidosis which could be given false pathological significance. In addition it may exacerbate an acidosis resulting from an actual pathological state. The use of a balanced salt solution such as Plasmalyte 148 may avoid these complications.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A simple method for the maintenance of oxygen saturation following intravenous induction of anaesthesia with propofol.
One hundred unpremedicated fit adult patients having elective minor day-stay surgery and general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two groups. During 30 s of intravenous propofol administration (2.5 mg.kg-1), study group patients (n = 50) were instructed to take three vital capacity breaths of room air, whilst control group patients (n = 50) were given no specific instructions. Pulse oximetry was continuously recorded over the next 5 min and the lowest oxygen saturation was noted. ⋯ Oxygen saturation returned to the pre-induction value significantly earlier in the study group patients compared with controls (97 s vs 135 s, p < 0.01). These results demonstrate that significant desaturation occurs in patients following intravenous induction of anaesthesia with propofol. This desaturation may be attenuated by asking patients to take three vital capacity breaths of room air during induction of anaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The addition of triamcinolone acetonide to bupivacaine has no effect on the quality of analgesia produced by ilioinguinal nerve block.
In a study of 30 men undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair under general anaesthesia no difference in postoperative pain, patient rating score or morphine consumption was found between patients who had pre-operative ilioinguinal nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5% plain and those who received a similar block with bupivacaine 0.5% plain and triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg. Mean (SD) morphine requirements using a patient-controlled analgesia system were 37 (22.2) mg and 32 (20.3) mg in the bupivacaine and bupivacaine/triamcinolone groups respectively (p > 0.05). The addition of triamcinolone 40 mg to bupivacaine 0.5% offers no advantages over unsupplemented bupivacaine when used for ilioinguinal block.