Anaesthesia
-
Cardioversion is a minor procedure requiring sedation and analgesia. However, it is often performed out-of-hours in remote sites by inexperienced anaesthetists. An understanding is required both of the pathophysiology underlying cardiac arrhythmias and of the technical side of defibrillation equipment, including electrical safety. ⋯ The anaesthetic agent chosen for patients undergoing cardioversion must provide analgesia and sedation, cause the least cardiovascular compromise possible and still enable rapid recovery. Propofol may be the closest anaesthetic agent to this ideal currently available, although careful titration of any agent chosen is also important. Cardioversion may be performed as an emergency, including in the pregnant patient, providing safe anaesthetic practice is followed.
-
Letter Historical Article
Classic paper: a fibreoptic endoscope used for tracheal intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Infusions of subhypnotic doses of propofol for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
We studied the antiemetic effects of a low dose infusion of propofol for 24 h after major gynaecological surgery in a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Fifty women of ASA physical status 1 or 2 undergoing major gynaecological surgery received an infusion of 1% propofol or intralipid at 0.1 ml.kg-1.h-1 for 24 h after surgery. Pain was managed using morphine delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia pump. ⋯ There were no differences between the two groups in any of the measures of postoperative nausea and vomiting during the first 48 h after surgery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting in the control group was less on the second day compared with the first postoperative day, but not in the propofol group. There were no side effects from the propofol infusion.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in children.
The recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane anaesthesia were compared in 40 children aged 6 months to 6 years undergoing day case surgery. The mean time taken to open eyes after surgery had ended was appreciably and significantly shorter after sevoflurane than after halothane (sevoflurane, mean time (SD) 7 min 52 s (5 min 46 s), halothane, mean time (SD) 15 min 50 s (9 min 2 s), t = 3.32, p = 0.002). ⋯ However, more children were in pain and given analgesia after sevoflurane (p < 0.01) and the mean time to reach the criteria for discharge home was similar in both groups (sevoflurane, mean time (SD) 2 h 9 min (17 min), halothane, mean time (SD) 2 h 4 min (8 min)). There were no major complications in either group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the induction characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in children.
The induction characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane were compared in 81 children aged 6 months to 6 years. The mean time taken to achieve loss of eyelash reflex was significantly shorter with sevoflurane than with halothane (sevoflurane, mean time (SD) 1 min 41 s (35 s), halothane, mean time (SD) 2 min 17 s (43 s), t = 4.11, p = < 0.01). ⋯ Effects on heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation during induction were similar for both agents. There were no major complications during induction with either halothane or sevoflurane.