Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the nasal mask and the nasopharyngeal airway in paediatric chair dental anaesthesia.
This study compared the quality of anaesthesia and surgical access afforded by two techniques for the administration of anaesthesia during paediatric chair dental procedures. A total of 50 ASA 1 paediatric day case patients were randomly assigned to receive anaesthesia through either the traditional Goldman nasal mask or through a nasopharyngeal airway. ⋯ Operating conditions were universally graded as excellent in the nasopharyngeal airway group, while those in the nasal mask group were graded as excellent/good in only 79% of cases (p < 0.0001). These results suggest that better quality anaesthesia and operating conditions can be achieved by using a nasopharyngeal airway rather than the traditional nasal mask for the administration of anaesthesia to paediatric chair dental patients.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Gastric intramucosal pH and blood lactate in severe sepsis.
We prospectively investigated the effect of conventional resuscitation on gastric intramucosal pH and lactate over 5 days in a group of patients with newly diagnosed severe sepsis. Lactate and gastric intramucosal pH were measured on entry into the study, as soon as resuscitation end points were met, eight hourly for 48 h and daily for 5 days. Sixteen of 18 patients had a low gastric intramucosal pH (mean (SD) 7.17 (0.12)) at the time of diagnosis of severe sepsis. ⋯ At 48 h lactate was lower in survivors (p < 0.01) and gastric intramucosal pH higher in survivors (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves at this time indicate that lactate is a better predictor of survival. It is likely, based on the inability of gastric intramucosal pH to distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors until 48 h, that it is not possible to use this measurement to guide resuscitation in patients who are severely ill and who have gastric intramucosal acidosis.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effects of a single pre-operative dexmedetomidine dose on isoflurane requirements and peri-operative haemodynamic stability.
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study we investigated the effect of a single pre-induction intravenous dose of dexmedetomidine 2 micrograms.kg-1 on anaesthetic requirements and peri-operative haemodynamic stability in 50 patients undergoing minor orthopaedic and general surgery. Patients were anaesthetised with nitrous oxide/oxygen/fentanyl, supplemented if necessary with isoflurane. ⋯ The haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and extubation was reduced in the dexmedetomidine group as was intra-operative heart rate variability; postoperative analgesic and anti-emetic requirements and peri-operative serum catecholamine concentrations were lower in the dexmedetomidine group. Hypotension and bradycardia occurred more frequently after dexmedetomidine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intra-ocular pressure changes following laryngeal mask airway insertion: a comparative study.
We compared the effects of the Brain laryngeal mask airway with a tracheal tube on intra-ocular pressure. Propofol was used as induction agent and atracurium as relaxant. Twenty-six patients with normal intra-ocular pressure undergoing cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups. ⋯ In the laryngeal mask airway group there were no significant changes in mean intra-ocular pressure. In the tracheal tube group there was a significant rise in mean intra-ocular pressure at 20 s (p = 0.0056) which returned to pre-insertion levels at 2 min. We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway continues to have advantages over the tracheal tube for ophthalmic surgery despite the use of propofol and atracurium as anaesthetic agents.
-
Despite common clinical opinion that patient-controlled analgesia should be renamed 'patient-controlled nausea', there is little evidence in support of the notion that postoperative nausea and vomiting are exacerbated by the method. Indeed, data indicate that opioid-sparing techniques are not associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although some evidence suggests that certain opioids are less emetogenic than others, this too does not stand scrutiny when compared across patients, although research is still required to find whether individual patients are better treated with a particular opioid. Similarly, the emerging practice of combining anti-emetics with patient-controlled analgesia needs wider study before it can be supported.