Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
TCI compared with manually controlled infusion of propofol: a multicentre study.
This prospective, randomised multicentre study was designed to determine the clinical profile of 'Diprifusor' target controlled infusion compared with manually controlled infusion of propofol in 562 patients, aged 18-85 years, in a range of surgical procedures in 29 centres. The dose of propofol required for loss of consciousness was statistically significantly lower in the target controlled infusion group [1.69 (0.50) vs. 2.31 (0.75) mg.kg-1, p < 0.001] but the overall rate of propofol administration was slightly, but significantly, higher [12.1 (5.1) vs. 11.0 (6.0) mg.kg-1.h-1, p < 0.05]. The target concentration (CT) required for induction decreased with increasing age and ASA class, with premedication and with the administration of an opioid before induction. ⋯ Despite the lack of experience of most investigators in using target controlled infusion, the clinical profiles of both propofol administrations were similar. Data suggest that the clinical profile of target controlled infusion may be improved with experience, for example by more active titration of CT to effect. Target controlled infusion may well become the preferred choice for anaesthetists.
-
Total intravenous anaesthesia may be most beneficial for day-case surgery with regard to quality of recovery, lack of complications and the ability to sustain an efficient throughput of patients. However, the technique can be applied to all forms of surgery and, with a little practice, consistent results will be achieved. ⋯ The commercially available 'Diprifusor', a target controlled infusion system for propofol, can facilitate the more widespread use of total intravenous techniques and allow their potential benefits to be applied and appreciated more widely. This review outlines some practical considerations that should enable a more confident approach to total intravenous techniques by anaesthetists who are unfamiliar with them.
-
Review Comparative Study
Intravenous anaesthesia: manual infusion schemes versus TCI systems.
Propofol was first used to induce and maintain anaesthesia in the early 1980s. Several infusion regimens were described, some based on pharmacokinetic predictions. Advances in computing technology subsequently have allowed the development of portable target controlled infusion devices, with drugs delivered to achieve specific predicted target blood propofol concentrations. Assessments of propofol target controlled infusion systems in clinical practice and comparisons of 'Diprifusor' target controlled infusion systems with manual infusion are reviewed here.
-
The 'Diprifusor' target controlled infusion system has been developed as a standardised infusion system for the administration of propofol by target controlled infusion. A preferred set of pharmacokinetic parameters for propofol was selected using computer simulation of a known infusion scheme with pharmacokinetic parameters described in published literature. The selected model was included in a 'Diprifusor' module that was interfaced with, and later incorporated into, a computer-compatible infusion pump. ⋯ Standardisation of the delivery performance (+/- 5%) of commercial systems has been achieved with a laboratory performance specification. Clinical studies indicate that the actual blood concentrations achieved were about 16% greater than the calculated values displayed by the system. In an individual patient, titration of the target concentration is required in the same manner as an anaesthetic vapouriser is adjusted to obtain a specific pharmacodynamic effect.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Evaluation of the HemoCue for measuring intra-operative haemoglobin concentrations: a comparison with the Coulter Max-M.
We compared haemoglobin concentration values obtained using a portable haemoglobinometer, the HemoCue, in the operating theatre with the results obtained by the Coulter Max-M in the laboratory. Haemoglobin concentrations were measured on 52 arterial blood samples obtained from 13 patients during aortic surgery, in theatre with the HemoCue and again by the Coulter Max-M. Twenty routine samples from the laboratory were also analysed by both methods. ⋯ The coefficients of repeatability of the 20 samples analysed in duplicate on each device were 0.26 g.dl-1 and 0.33 g.dl-1, respectively. The coefficients of variance were 0.74% (HemoCue) and 0.93% (Coulter). With adequate training and monitoring, the HemoCue provides comparable haemoglobin results for near-patient testing in theatre.