Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of the effects of intravenous alfentanil and esmolol on the cardiovascular response to double-lumen endobronchial intubation.
We compared the effect of alfentanil 10 microg.kg-1 and esmolol 1.5 mg.kg-1 on the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and double-lumen endobronchial intubation in two groups of 20 ASA 2-3 patients undergoing pulmonary surgery, in a randomised double-blind study. Arterial pressure and heart rate decreased after induction of anaesthesia and increased after intubation in both groups (p < 0.05) but remained at or below baseline values, and changes were comparable in both groups. ⋯ Norepinephrine concentrations increased significantly in both groups after intubation but were higher in the esmolol group (p < 0.05). Although both esmolol 1.5 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 10 microg.kg-1 similarly attenuated the arterial pressure and heart rate response to endobronchial intubation, plasma catecholamine concentrations increased in the esmolol group to values greater than previously reported after tracheal intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Patient-controlled analgesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting: efficacy of a continuous infusion of ondansetron.
A continuous infusion of ondansetron was compared with a placebo infusion in 80 patients undergoing major breast reconstructive surgery. All patients received a standard anaesthetic and a bolus dose of ondansetron after induction. ⋯ Postoperative analgesia was provided by patient-controlled subcutaneous diamorphine. In the ondansetron group, the severity of nausea, measured by a 10-point verbal rating scale, was reduced (p = 0.01) and fewer patients stated at postoperative interview that nausea and vomiting was a problem (p = 0.01).
-
Regional anaesthesia has seen the development of a new local anaesthetic: levobupivacaine. This review aims to outline the rationale underlying the development of levobupivacaine and to consider its place in modern regional anaesthesia.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
A comparison of the intubating and standard laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel.
Twenty-four inexperienced participants were timed inserting the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal mask airway in 75 anaesthetised subjects. Adequacy of ventilation was assessed on a three-point scale. The pressure at which a leak first developed around the device's cuff was also measured. ⋯ However, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was better at providing adequate ventilation without audible leak (58/75 (77%) vs. 42/75 (56%); p = 0.009). The median (range [IQR]) pressure at which an audible leak developed was higher for the intubating laryngeal mask airway, 34.5 (14-40 [29-40]) cmH2O, than for the laryngeal mask airway, 27.5 (14-40 [22-33]) cmH2O (p < 0.001). The intubating laryngeal mask airway is worthy of further consideration as a tool for emergency airway management for inexperienced personnel.