Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomised prospective trial of intra-operative oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid administration in major gynaecological surgery.
Intra-operative oesophageal Doppler monitor-guided fluid management has been associated with improved postoperative length of hospital stay and morbidity in gastrointestinal and orthopaedic surgery. We designed a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that this approach to intra-operative fluid management in major elective open gynaecological surgery would shorten the length of postoperative stay, defined as time to readiness for hospital discharge. Postoperative morbidity was evaluated as a secondary outcome. ⋯ There was no difference between the groups in postoperative morbidity survey scores on postoperative days 1, 3 or 5. Seven patients in the oesophageal Doppler monitor group and 11 in the control group experienced postoperative complications (p = 0.41). These findings question whether intra-operative oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid therapy is of benefit in patients undergoing open gynaecological surgery.
-
Inter-arm differences in blood pressure may confound haemodynamic management in vascular surgery. We evaluated 898 patients in the vascular pre-assessment clinic to determine the prevalence of inter-arm differences in systolic and mean arterial pressure, quantify the consequent risk of clinical error in siting monitoring peri-operatively and evaluate systolic inter-arm difference as a predictor of all-cause mortality (median follow-up 49 months). The prevalence of a systolic inter-arm difference ≥ 15 mmHg was 26% (95% CI 23-29%). ⋯ The hazard ratio for a systolic inter-arm difference ≥ 15 mmHg vs < 15 mmHg was 1.03 (95% CI 0.78-1.36, p = 0.84). Large inter-arm blood pressure differences are common in this population, with a high potential for monitoring errors. Systolic inter-arm difference was not associated with medium-term mortality. [Correction added on 17 October 2013, after first online publication: In the Summary the sentence beginning 'We evaluated 898 patients' was corrected from (median (IQR [range]) follow-up 49 months) to read (median follow up 49 months)].