Anaesthesia
-
Ninety patients scheduled to undergo minor gynaecological surgery were divided into three groups. Group 1 received propofol only, for both induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. ⋯ The incidence of nausea in group 1 was 0%, in group 2, 3.4% and in group 3, 9.4%. No patient vomited.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Recovery times and side effects after propofol infusion and after isoflurane during ear surgery with additional infiltration anaesthesia.
Two anaesthetic procedures that did not include nitrous oxide were compared in a randomised study of 50 patients for tympanoplasty and tympanoscopy: propofol given for induction and maintenance, and thiopentone-isoflurane given for induction and maintenance, respectively. Induction in the first group was with a bolus injection of propofol and the same agent was given for the duration of anaesthesia by continuous intravenous administration. Thiopentone was given until loss of the eyelash reflex and anaesthesia maintained with isoflurane 0.4-2.0%. ⋯ The two patient groups were analysed for age, sex and weight as well as for side effects during the induction, maintenance and recovery periods, such as coughing, vomiting, venous pain, spontaneous movements, singultus, headaches, dysrhythmias and psychic disorders possibly due to anaesthesia. Side effects were moderate in both groups. Recovery time was statistically significantly shorter in the propofol group and the patients in this group appeared to be much more aware after recovery than those in the thiopentone-isoflurane group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison between propofol and ketamine for anaesthesia in the elderly. Haemodynamic effects during induction and maintenance.
The haemodynamic effects of propofol and ketamine were studied in two groups of eight randomly allocated elderly patients (mean age 85.8 years) anaesthetised for hip replacement. Group 1 patients patients received propofol 1 mg/kg by intravenous bolus for induction and 0.1 mg/kg/minute by continuous infusion for maintenance. Group 2 patients received ketamine 1.5 mg/kg by intravenous bolus as induction dose and 50 micrograms/kg/minute by continuous infusion for maintenance. ⋯ Myocardial oxygen consumption showed a significant decrease of 27%. There was a significant increase in blood pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (by 97%) in group 2. Cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance remained unchanged whereas myocardial oxygen consumption showed a very significant increase of 100%.
-
Propofol and methohexitone were evaluated as hypnotics in a total intravenous anaesthesia technique without nitrous oxide in 50 patients of ASA grade 1 or 2. Analgesia was provided by a constant alfentanil infusion and the depth of anaesthesia was controlled by varying the infusion rate of propofol or methohexitone. Induction and intubation responses were smooth and moderate in the propofol group and side effects were few. ⋯ Postoperatively 96% of the propofol patients were clear-headed within 20 minutes, in contrast to only 48% in the methohexitone group. We conclude that propofol together with alfentanil, both given by a bolus plus infusion technique, provide controllable and satisfactory total intravenous anaesthesia without recourse to nitrous oxide or other inhalational agents. Methohexitone was not as satisfactory as propofol.