Der Anaesthesist
-
Uncertainty exists on how to treat patients suffering from accidental hypothermia and on the optimal transport decisions. The aim of this review is to provide an updated evidence-based reference for the pre-hospital and in-hospital management of patients with accidental hypothermia and for the transport decisions required to facilitate treatment. Advances in the efficiency and availability of rewarming techniques have improved the prognosis for patients presenting with hypothermia. ⋯ Hypothermic patients with cardiac instability (i.e. systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, ventricular arrhythmia and core body temperature < 28 °C) should be rewarmed with active external and minimally invasive rewarming techniques in a hospital which also has circulation substituting venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) facilities. In cardiac arrest patients VA-ECMO may be a better treatment option than CBP and survival rates of 100 % can be achieved compared to ~ 10 % with traditional methods (e.g. body cavity lavage). Early transport to a hospital appropriately equipped for rewarming has the potential to decrease complication rates and improve survival.
-
Anesthetists will encounter palliative patients in the daily routine as palliative patients undergo operations and interventions as well, depending on the state of the disease. The first challenge for anesthetists will be to recognize the patient as being palliative. In the course of further treatment it will be necessary to address the specific problems of this patient group. ⋯ In the psychosocial domain, good communication skills are expected of anesthetists, especially during the preoperative interview. Ethical conflicts exist with the decision-making process for surgery and the handling of perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders. This article addresses these areas of conflict and the aim is to enable anesthetists to provide the best possible perioperative care to this vulnerable patient group with the goal to maintain quality of life and keep postoperative recovery as short as possible.
-
Within the framework of a risk assessment procedure the Committee for Risk Assessment of Pharmacovigilance (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) came to the conclusion that the benefits of hydroxylethyl starch infusion solutions (HES) no longer outweighed the risks and on 14 June 2013 recommended that approval should be suspended. Until the procedure has finally been concluded, which could last several months, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM) has recommended that HES should not be used. ⋯ The third generation HES solutions cannot be completely replaced by other colloids and in future crystalloids will more strongly again broadly form the basis for infusion therapy. In this aspect balanced crystalloids have priority with respect to the acid-base equilibrium. The history of HES has impressively shown that infusion therapy must be adjusted on a scientifically founded basis, whether in intensive care medicine, perioperative or emergency medicine. Large prospective studies with clinically relevant endpoints are urgently needed.
-
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-receptor agonist with sedative, analgetic and anxiolytic effects. It is chemically related to clonidine and has been an authorized drug in Europe since September 2011. ⋯ Patients sedated by dexmedetomidine can statistically be extubated earlier and an influence on duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not been shown. Daily therapy costs are approximately 5 times higher than those of propofol but an objective standpoint in relation to clinical cost efficiency is unattainable.
-
Comparative Study
[Significantly shorter anesthesia time for surgery of the lumbar spine : Process analytical comparison of spinal anesthesia and intubation narcosis].
Most surgery of the lumbar spine is performed with the patient under general anesthesia (GA); however, qualitative benefits of spinal anesthesia (SA) have been reported. The goal of this study was to compare time efficiency between these two anesthesia methods in lumbar spine surgery. To test the hypothesis that the use of SA leads to significant time saving compared to GA for lumbar spine surgery, key points in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative anesthesiology care times were analyzed. The focus was on anesthesia time excluding surgery time. ⋯ This study showed that in lumbar spine surgery 19 min of anesthesia time can be saved using SA compared to GA which could have an impact on economic aspects. Gender, BMI and ASA had no statistically detectable influence on the choice between the two anesthesia methods. The fact that time-intensive complex instrumentation is mainly performed in younger patients may explain why GA patients were younger than SA patients.