Der Anaesthesist
-
The possibility that a patient during general anaesthesia is aware of the operation going on and aware of severe pain that might be remembered postoperatively must be very alarming to patients and anaesthetists alike. Furthermore, there is experimental evidence showing that conscious recall of intraoperative events is only the tip of an iceberg; it seems very probable that there is even a higher incidence of unconscious perception during general anaesthesia. Therefore, the following stages of intraoperative awareness must be distinguished: (1) conscious awareness with explicit recall and with severe pain; (2) conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pains; (3) conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (4) subconscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (5) no awareness. ⋯ Some general anaesthetics or anaesthetic procedures, e.g. the combination of a relaxant and N2O, opioid mono-anaesthetics, or opioids combined with benzodiazepines, seem to involve a higher risk of intraoperative awareness than do volatile anaesthetics. The bases of litigation are medical malpractice, breach of contract by the anaesthesiologist or lack of informed consent from the patient. Therefore, patients who are at risk of intraoperative awareness should be given detailed information on this special risk before the operation.
-
BACKGROUND AND METHODS. Small, periodic fluctuations in heart rate are well known to physicians, the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) being the most easily detectable form of this heart rate variability (HRV). Since it is caused by changing activity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) controlling heart rate, HRV is investigated to gain information on the functional states of the ANS. ⋯ Since is also a striking reduction produced by most anaesthetic agents, RSA and HRV are investigated as measures of anaesthetic depth. There are contradictory data on the influence of ventilation, medication, and co-existing disease on the spectrum, and thus validation of the method is still to be achieved. It has, however, been proven useful in some studies as a parameter for risk assessment of perioperative or post-infarction cardiovascular complications.