Der Anaesthesist
-
Sepsis and septic shock are the leading causes of death in non-cardiological intensive care units in developed countries despite recent advances in critical care medicine. Sepsis is the systemic inflammatory response to infection, often associated with hypoperfusion followed by tissue injury and organ failure. Activation of monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils with consecutive release of proinflammatory mediators and activation of the coagulation cascade, seem to play a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. ⋯ In contrast,now two new promising treatment options may be emerging: application of small doses hydrocortisone and activated protein C [drotrecogin alfa (activated)]. Large and in part multicentric studies especially in the last 2 years now allow the practicing clinician to perform a partially evidence-based management of patients with sepsis. In addition, for the first time two options for specific therapy of sepsis,application of small doses hydrocortisone and activated protein C [drotrecogin alfa (activated)],are available which may further improve prognosis for septic patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Anaesthesia for caesarean section. Comparison of two general anaesthetic regimens and spinal anaesthesia].
The study was undertaken to compare different anaesthetic techniques for scheduled or urgent caesarean section with respect to maternal circulatory parameters, maternal and fetal endocrine stress response, fetal vitality parameters and further clinical parameters such as recovery and analgesic demand. ⋯ When compared with methohexitone, sevoflurane and N(2)O for caesarean section, initial total intravenous anaesthesia with esketamine and methohexitone mediated specific antinociception without negative maternal or fetal effects and not taking invasion kinetics or elimination between uterotomia and cord cutting into consideration. Avoidance of N(2)O allows optimal oxygenation of the fetomaternal unit. Stress protection and hemodynamic responses were well balanced, and intraoperative recall or negative dream reactions were lacking. Superior postoperative pain protection was advantageous after spinal anaesthesia, but in contrast, nausea and vomiting were more frequent in this group.